No real hang up... just explaining how the GPS will almost always under-read. As I said I just take the average speed multiplied by time & GPS distance & average them out which I think gives probably the most accurate value I'll get. The funny one is when I get to work & find I've cycled 5-7 miles... erms no! point to point is something like 7.5 miles that's solved by letting the GPS 'settle' for about 20 min in on top of the water butt.jimboalee said:I don't understand the 'hang up' with distance measurement.
slowmotion said:Oh lorks! I'm starting to get nervous. I shall not reveal my maths A level grade...
Valy said:Say what?
slowmotion said:{Four Yorkshiremen, Monty Python...}
In them days, an A-Level was the equivalent of a PhD from Oxbridge, what with the current dumbing down an' all.
Since you ask...
D
slowmotion said:{shuffles about nervously}
1972
Valy said:Haha! That I got
Are you being serious though? Was there really a time where an A-level was looked at as a Degree and whatnot from Uni?
slowmotion said:No, but I once saw some maths exam papers from the mid-Fifties, and they were rocket science compared to the stuff my daughter gets given. Anyway, the "dumbing down" business is a bit of a sensitive issue and this isn't P&L...
Valy said:I see. ... and I see, and agree.
What is P&L though?
slowmotion said:No, but I once saw some maths exam papers from the mid-Fifties, and they were rocket science compared to the stuff my daughter gets given. Anyway, the "dumbing down" business is a bit of a sensitive issue and this isn't P&L...
GrasB said:my favoured method, though it does need an assistant & a surveyors tape, is on a quiet straight road/pavement make a mark on the surface. Get on the bike with the valve in a known position. Get your assistant to push you along & count say 10 revolutions of the wheel, mark that on the ground. Now get your tape & measure the distance between the two marks. Divide the distance you get by the number of wheel rotations.