There are often times when I reckon the dual carriageways round here are the safest places to cycle. The ones I use have decent wide lanes, some double yellows, are well lit after dark and relatively quiet, and offer good visibility - and I rate them as significantly safer than some of the narrow single carriageways with poorer lighting and parked cars adding to the risk.... dual carriageway ... You won't catch me on them, it's too dangerous.
Agreed. Dual carriageways provide ample room (i.e. a whole lane) for drivers to safely overtake.There are often times when I reckon the dual carriageways round here are the safest places to cycle. The ones I use have decent wide lanes, some double yellows, are well lit after dark and relatively quiet, and offer good visibility - and I rate them as significantly safer than some of the narrow single carriageways with poorer lighting and parked cars adding to the risk.
Oh, and to comment on unlit cyclists, when I restarted last year I was a bit shocked by the number of young guys I saw on bikes after dark, dressed in the Scouse uniform of black tracksuit, and with no lights. But I soon realised that the local papers aren't full of stories of accidents, so the evidence suggests they're being seen and not being hit (not that I'd recommend it, of course).
Alan
Covfefe!Agreed. Dual carriageways provide ample room (i.e. a whole lane) for drivers to safely overtake.
A friend of mine was wearing a high-viz jacket once, and he fell down a big hole - they're not so safe, are they?
No,holes aren't safe.
You have to give extra points for sticking the dismount.Poor flounce.
3/10.
Falling in is worse. What's at the bottom of them?Holes are perfectly safe,it's standing on the edge that isn't
On Thursday night(23:13) though, just not posting.
Funnily enough, the hole my friend fell down was surrounded by proper high-viz safety barriers - he was the one who had just erected them