resal1 said:
Have Vision 1 picked up a sponsor yet ? If not, is it lack of finance that is preventing them attending the races ?
They have various partners, although I don't know how well-off the team is. I'd be surprised if this is the reason for their non-attendances, though, since the line up for the Boucle features three very small teams (4 Life/Freebike, Charlottenburg Berlin and Royal Antwerp). The Giro has a higher standard of participation but if Vision 1 can manage six days in Germany then you'd think ten in Italy wouldn't be too much of a stretch. But if financial reasons aren't it, sporting reasons don't exactly add up either.
BC must have contacts other than SKY trying to get an "in" with cycling. Should Sky be involved with a Women's team ?
I wasn't entirely keen on the idea of a men's Sky team, although I think that's mostly down to hating Murdoch. There's no doubt some big bucks could help things out, but there's not exactly an abundance of interest out there. Here we return to our circular arguments about lack of publicity and coverage...
You know, in a patronising kind of way I actually
like the thriftier approach to women's cycling even though I want to see it change. There is an undeniable romanticism to the stories of riders who are working during the morning or studying at university and only cycling in their spare time, for the
love of it; it's no replacement for an improved women's cycling infrastructure, but when pure professionalism has ripped the heart out of so much sport I am wary of seeing our women go the same way. Of course, when you think about the income differences between the top riders and the bottom ones it isn't really a tolerable situation, and to ensure talented and passionate riders aren't squeezed out there has to be financial development of the sport, but we should bear in mind the potential costs as well.