I don’t have any issues with technology or manufacturer’s implementing it. However I do have an issue with the way it is marketed,to create a situation just to sell more bikes, as is the case with disc brakes by taking away the choice and convincing those who don’t know better/any different that this is somehow superior in every way. I except there are situations where disc brakes have benefit such as commuting but not in every situation. They add weight and cost and also in my (and many others) opinion effect the balance and feel of a light weight road bike. Oh and the Pro’s ride what they given/told to before anyone cites the pro peloton.
Electronic shifting is another piece of “technology “ being forced upon us without being given a choice (in the case of two of the major manufacturers, fortunately we are still blessed with Campagnolo who know better). Bicycles are essentially simple machines driven by human power, with the exception of bikes with electronic assistance which is fine as it allows people to exercise who otherwise possibly couldn’t.
By all means offer these options but let them be just that!
I don't see how we are being "forced" towards electronic shifting. Yes, 105 and up have now gone electronic only, but mechanical 105 & Ultegra will be available for a good few years yet, even installed on new bikes.
And the new CUES system will give access to 11 speed mechanical shifting for the foreseeable future.
It is only if you want really top end stuff that Shimano and SRAM are no longer giving a mechanical option.
Disk brakes, you have more of a point. Though it isn't as simple as the pros just "ride what they are told to", which is why several pro teams kept rim brakes for a year or two after most had gone to discs.