My new Photo website

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
M

Melvil

Guest
Dannyg said:
Nice pics and well laid out website. Took a while to connect to the home page through.

Good you mentioned it as I've noticed the same thing happening too - I'm working on that, think it's an SQL query problem (:biggrin:) or probs with the ISP.
 
OP
OP
M

Melvil

Guest
alecstilleyedye said:
great stuff melvil. very different from my own (amateur) style, but could be a good source of inspiration :biggrin:

if i had time to photoshop my shots, i might have a few to show off.

i'll point some of my colleagues (in advertising) to your site just in case…

Cheers! :biggrin:
 
OP
OP
M

Melvil

Guest
Radius said:
I'm not big on over-processed, or what you might call artistically manipulated images per se, but some of these are really nice. The Forth Rail bridge shot is nicely done, but I'm sure it would have been nice left as is too. That's a personal thing. What gear do you use? Also do you HDR / tone map? I should imagine so given the dynamic range in some of those shots, but you can never be sure :biggrin:

Not big on HDR, really. Sometimes works, sometimes doesn't. I prefer LUCIS (a plug-in for Photoshop) if I want to do that sort of thing. It can have amazing results. The Forth Rail Bridge shot - you may laugh - hasn't had any photoshopping at all - the colours are because it was a very long exposure at sunset and I had to use Cokin filters to dampen out the light - the only one I had left was a graduated 'tobacco' coloured filter so that's why the sky is rather orange. Have to say that cokin filters - especially ND ones - are the business.

As for gear I have a Nikon SLR, a normal zoom, big zoom, and (my favourite) a wide angle lens which can make some nice landscape shots. Oh, got a canon compact, too.

Must say I had a 'D'oh!' moment last night on the way home, I saw a fox in a garden about six feet from where I stood. It was beautiful. And I didn't have any cameras :biggrin:

Mel :biggrin:
 
OP
OP
M

Melvil

Guest
Crackle said:
HDR is contrast masking in a plug-in, right?

Pretty much, I would say, it uses very similar techniques and is easier to set up and tweak but I would think, though, that if you were wanting definitive control you'd probably use contrast masking? As you say, there are certainly more ways to expand the dynamic range of a picture than just HDR.
 

Mr Phoebus

New Member
Speicher said:
Excellent website, easy to navigate, lovely pictures 10/10.

A small slightly off-topic question, what is the difference between a Nebulla (in one of your photos) and the Aurora Borealis?

A nebula is another name for a far off galaxy.
The Borealis is in the Earth's upper atmosphere.
 
Melvil said:
Pretty much, I would say, it uses very similar techniques and is easier to set up and tweak but I would think, though, that if you were wanting definitive control you'd probably use contrast masking? As you say, there are certainly more ways to expand the dynamic range of a picture than just HDR.

Well I had a look at the HDR plug-in site and it seems to work exactly the same as Contrast Masking, so being a skinflint, I'll stick with Contrast Masking which is useful but as you say, doesn't work in every case.
 

Speicher

Vice Admiral
Moderator
Mr Phoebus said:
A nebula is another name for a far off galaxy.
The Borealis is in the Earth's upper atmosphere.

Not so much off-topic then, but not on this planet. ;):ohmy:

Thank you for your knowledgeable answer, I thought the Nebulla looked a bit :wacko: like the Aurora Borealis, perhaps not.
 
OP
OP
M

Melvil

Guest
Crackle said:
Well I had a look at the HDR plug-in site and it seems to work exactly the same as Contrast Masking, so being a skinflint, I'll stick with Contrast Masking which is useful but as you say, doesn't work in every case.

Och, exactly. Layer masks and curves/levels often achieve a similar result too.
 
OP
OP
M

Melvil

Guest
Speicher said:
Not so much off-topic then, but not on this planet. ;):smile:

Thank you for your knowledgeable answer, I thought the Nebulla looked a bit :smile: like the Aurora Borealis, perhaps not.

No, it just a small part of a much larger NASA image (yay, copyright free images, thanks NASA / US Government - don't get to say that one often, eh?) of a Nebula...can't remember which one.
 
Top Bottom