Mundane News

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
A REALLY clever cat would have ridden it home and then killed it! :okay:

A rat run would seem to be the quickest way.
 
A farm I worked on had very rocky fields and one seasonal job we had involved going round a field due to be ploughed with a tractor and trailer with large hammers and crowbars. We dug out large rocks and split them by hammering before removal. There is an art to rock splitting by hammer and it was a very satisfying task.:becool:

In the same way that splitting logs is. ^_^
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
I have just ordered 12kg of cat biscuits and 25kg (35 litres) of cat litter.

That is a lot of cat biscuits!
 

classic33

Leg End Member
My feeling is that you should vote as the danger is when too many do not vote that the wrong people get into power.
Being a bit of a political nerd and activist when I was younger I would say that anyway.
Incidentally I wonder how many realise that the vote while ostensibly secret can be traced to a specific person. Not easy but still possible. There was a bit of a stooshie locally when a well known politician apparently knew the number of postal votes cast in our constituency before polling day. Never came to anything so it must have got hushed up somehow.
He can't have known the number of postal votes cast before polling day. A list of postal voters is available to all candidates, whether all use them, let alone before polling day can't be known. They are counted at the same time as the votes cast in the polling stations, not before. They can also be accepted in polling stations on the day.

So whilst the total number of postal votes issued can be known, the number can't, as they are counted once only.
 
Top Bottom