rockyroller
Guru
- Location
- 20 miles northwest of Boston, MA
Can't comment on Nikon gear, I'm afraid...
I started out with that Sigma 28-105 and a Canon 37-300 which I bought as a "kit" with my EOS 5 35mm body. The Sigma was decent, the Canon 75-300 not, the latter being too short and too slow. After an ill-advised foray into extenders, I bought a 100-400 L.
I do have a Sigma 300 2.8 plus extenders. I'd say it's OK, no more than that. Not a patch on the Canon 300 2.8 which I had on loan for a while. That is one banging lens. But I compromised with the Sigma, because a) I couldn't justify the cost vs usage for the Canon, and b) I couldn't actually handle the Canon very well as it was just too big and heavy. I'm a 4ft 11 tall lady, not a 6ft plus bloke...
The Sigma does a job when I need it, but the chromatic abberation gets intrusive after a while.
I've got a buddy who works for a newspaper. he's not paid much but they buy him top of the line equipment. so amazing what he can do hand-held. so jealous