D
Deleted member 26715
Guest
A Suzuki Airfix
Aah! The (allegedly) 100mph 250. What I do remember is that every local X7 owner had to prove it by passing every other biker as they all had something to prove. How it was to be 17 in 1978, compared with learner restrictions today.Another on the bucket list has been ticked. Collected this today, needs a few things but essentially (it seems) a bloody nice bike.
View attachment 526323
View attachment 526324
Aah! The (allegedly) 100mph 250. What I do remember is that every local X7 owner had to prove it by passing every other biker as they all had something to prove. How it was to be 17 in 1978, compared with learner restrictions today.
And to be honest, I wonder how much good all this training and testing has really done to reduce motorcycle accident rates? I'd love to see pre "Multi driving test" figures and compare them to single test figures, and I strongly suspect the number of accidents are linked to the number of bikes on the road rather than how well trained the riders have been.Society keeps as kids as kids for far too long nowadays, at 16 I was mobile and could do 45mph, at 17 I rode my 250 to the south of France, camping all the way, with my pals. It seemed simple at the time but a similar adventure will remain a dream for kids today.
Along with those who just don't get the responsibility of driving a car down the road, they believe it's their right not an earned priviledge.some people will always have way too much confidence in the ability they just don't have.
Unfortunately, far too often all or part of the blame does lie with the motorcyclist. Either way, too many are dying and something needs to be done.Which is ridiculous unless the accidents are being caused by the motorcyclists, make the car test & fines far higher
Indeed. The TRRL, as they were then, concludes that there is no link between motorcycle performance and accident statistics. The same year the government respond by reducing learners to 125's and getting them to mix it up with traffic on low powered, poor handling machinery.
Which is ridiculous unless the accidents are being caused by the motorcyclists, make the car test & fines far higher
Both too true, sadly. The standards of four-wheel driving in this country are appalling. Not a single commute, and most cycling, goes by without me seeing something that would fail a driving test, more usually multiple times. But, equally, too many bikers are idiots. Not all the offenders are yoof with L-plates by any means.Unfortunately, far too often all or part of the blame does lie with the motorcyclist. Either way, too many are dying and something needs to be done.
Seen a couple of RE Interceptor 650's parked up on my rideout today, one with the black & red tank and one with a plain silver tank. The latter was a better colour imo, it really added to the classy retro look. Had a good look around them and i must say i was very impressed with the finish on them. The p twin engine really does look stunning with a proper classic look to it.
If i were in the market for this style of bike i would be very tempted by it.
I dunno my Honda CB125S was one of my favourite bikes, nimble and quite a torquey little motor, it helped that I'd fitted a 1 tooth bigger gearbox sprocket though as it used to over rev in top before.Indeed. The TRRL, as they were then, concludes that there is no link between motorcycle performance and accident statistics. The same year the government respond by reducing learners to 125's and getting them to mix it up with traffic on low powered, poor handling machinery.