Can you give me a link to that please?
My mistake, the Himalayan is £62, Interceptor £82, still very cheap. They’re a nice bike.
https://www.royalenfield.co.uk/finance-options/2020-royal-enfield-interceptor-int-650-twin-39
Can you give me a link to that please?
My mistake, the Himalayan is £62, Interceptor £82, still very cheap. They’re a nice bike.
https://www.royalenfield.co.uk/finance-options/2020-royal-enfield-interceptor-int-650-twin-39
I think cars and bike prices have been rising disproportionately recently, encouraging PCP to keep you renting and buying again, a sure bubble.I remember my father saying that about a car he bought around 1976, since then he must have had another 10-15 until we had to prise the keys out of his hands at the age of 94
Yep once you are on the treadmill unless you want to go back to a much older car they've got you. I can't see the sense in it TBHI think cars and bike prices have been rising disproportionately recently, encouraging PCP to keep you renting and buying again, a sure bubble.
The interceptor was designed by ex Triumph people in the UK, IMO it looks much better than the modern retro Triumphs.
Is that the Himalayan? It looks a lot more Scrambler-ey than the stock pictures. I love the look. What do you think of it? I love the look of all the enfields but just wondering what 29hp (or whatever it has) compares to other bikes in terms of acceleation etc. I've only had 125s (14hp) and 600s (70-90hp), nothing much inbetweenMorning rides yesterday and today around North Lincs and South Yorks / Doncaster areas ..... The gout has kicked in after 2 years since it's last visit so i can't get my cycling shoes on .... any excuse for the motor bike ..... Back cycling on Wednesday hopefully after the meds have done their thing.
Will try to park further from the dog poo bin next time ........ doh!
View attachment 518037
View attachment 518039
View attachment 518041
Is that the Himalayan? It looks a lot more Scrambler-ey than the stock pictures. I love the look. What do you think of it? I love the look of all the enfields but just wondering what 29hp (or whatever it has) compares to other bikes in terms of acceleation etc. I've only had 125s (14hp) and 600s (70-90hp), nothing much inbetween
Blimey! Turbulence! it must be incredibly fast then. Does it suck small creatures out of hedges, overturn parked cars, cause following traffic to lose control and swerve all over the road? Seriously though, it looks good in that understated finish. Practical issues for a shortarse such as I would be, what's the seat height? Historically, Enfields have been known for fuel economy, are the modern engines as economical? How far on a tankful before reserve (if it has a reserve)? 29 hp is not massive in this day and age but if it's all useable and delivered in a relaxed manner it's all good. I have done loads of miles on a lot less. If my legs would stretch it could be my next bike. Are those tyres tubeless?I've ridden 100's of thousands of motorcycle miles on every thing from MZ's to ZZR 1100's and i find the Himma a breath of fresh air .... It's heavy ... but nimble, the acceleration is ... low by comparison to the ZZR and the Gixer .. View attachment 523148
.. but it's a joy to ride ... It's my daily ride as my company pays my fuel and are happy to pay the bikes fuel as well as the van ..
Brilliant bike ... top class kit for very little pennies ...I removed the secondary mudguard on purchase ... it's for looks only and causes turbulence so it's safely stowed in the shed.
Blimey! Turbulence! it must be incredibly fast then. Does it suck small creatures out of hedges, overturn parked cars, cause following traffic to lose control and swerve all over the road? Seriously though, it looks good in that understated finish. Practical issues for a shortarse such as I would be, what's the seat height? Historically, Enfields have been known for fuel economy, are the modern engines as economical? How far on a tankful before reserve (if it has a reserve)? 29 hp is not massive in this day and age but if it's all useable and delivered in a relaxed manner it's all good. I have done loads of miles on a lot less. If my legs would stretch it could be my next bike. Are those tyres tubeless?
You left out the word "helmet" in your reference to turbulence. My psychic powers are not what they were. I see what you mean about the secondary mudguard, having looked at some reviews. You might like to try one of these. This is a genuine Xcreen, though cheaper versions are available on Amazon now. Surprisingly good for turbulence reduction/elimination. This is a clamp on version. It has been on 2 bikes, has done about 18,000 miles so far.If you've actually ridden motorbikes for "loads of miles" i'm sure your very aware of helmet turbulence and it's effects.
>70 MPG / 280 per tank@£11 per fill.
29hp in this day and age is remarkably similar to the 29hp of previous days.
Only real problem is the seat height ... it's for shortarses. Good seat raising kits available, personally i have a swimming float cut to fit and gaffer taped on top for long rides ....
Excellent forum ... but very dry humour abounds .... http://www.royalenfieldowners.com/index.php?whats-new/posts/48161/
You left out the word "helmet" in your reference to turbulence. My psychic powers are not what they were. I see what you mean about the secondary mudguard, having looked at some reviews. You might like to try one of these. This is a genuine Xcreen, though cheaper versions are available on Amazon now. Surprisingly good for turbulence reduction/elimination. This is a clamp on version. It has been on 2 bikes, has done about 18,000 miles so far.
View attachment 523275
70mpg is respectable. 280 miles per tank is useful.
29hp in this day and age is remarkably dissimilar to the 24.3hp quoted on Royal Enfield's website! Doubt if it makes any difference in real life, as your experience is that it rides well.
My definition as an actual practicing shortarse might be a bit different from your view from your lofty vantage point. You like the seat higher, I prefer it lower. For me, 800mm/31.5 inches gets a bit marginal once I get a few winter layers and a set of waterproofs on! Still, the only thing to do is find one and try it for size. It is still a low seat for this style of bike, especially with the excellent ground clearance.
I will look at the RE forum you mentioned for more information.
Quite a few riders remove the screen completely and report 0 turbulence ... with out noticing the screen angle is adjustable ....