Good point - looking back at the past 20 years I can only see Pip Gilbert as not having a whiff of doping.If you look down the history of winners of the Ardennes races, you'll see a whole litany of known cheats and dopers: Rebellin, Schumacher, Di Luca, Vinokourov, Riis, and many, many more. These races seem to be ones for which doping has conferred a particular advantage....
I like Gilbert, but as time goes by that "year" seems more and more bizarre.Even he's been questioned after his stellar year.
I like him too and I give him the benefit of the doubt that he took his eye off the ball, had a decent amount of money, got married (I think) and struggled to get re-motivated.I like Gilbert, but as time goes by that "year" seems more and more bizarre.
A bit like Voeckler and Rolland in the 2011 TdeF
Alternatively, you could argue that an exceptional year, rather than continuous solid performances is more natural, understandable. It's just our jaundiced view which makes for squint eyed scrutiny.I like Gilbert, but as time goes by that "year" seems more and more bizarre.
A bit like Voeckler and Rolland in the 2011 TdeF
FTFY :-)If you look down the history of winners of all professional cycling races, you'll see a whole litany of known cheats and dopers.....
Maybe, but given that Cadel Evans, Dan Martin and Gilbert (see above) have done well in the Ardennes classics, they also look to be races where clean riders can actually do OK.These races seem to be ones for which doping has conferred a particular advantage....
Maybe, but given that Cadel Evans, Dan Martin and Gilbert (see above) have done well in the Ardennes classics, they also look to be races where clean riders can actually do OK.
I suspect there is a big sell from the Croatian Tourist Board.