huwsparky
Über Member
- Location
- Llangrannog
I agree.Landa is surely a more realistic proposition for the Giro?
I agree.Landa is surely a more realistic proposition for the Giro?
You probably would care if you were in that position and a car pulled out in front of you!I am just catching up with Fleche Wallone, and am starting to get p*ssed off with every bloody commentator mentioning "bad example for the children watching" when the riders rest their arms on the bars in what the commentators seem to call "faux time trial position" - who gives a flying f*ck?!!
I don't think you are getting what I am on about. I can't remember hearing any commentators saying "children, please do not descend Alpine passes at over 100kph..."You probably would care if you were in that position and a car pulled out in front of you!
Not a chance. But I hope he does well and doesn't have a disastrous day.but can you really see him beating Quintana?
Apart from anything else, these new fangled positions, the puppy paws and the pedalling whilst sat on the top tube, just look so awful. Sure I want them banned but it's hard to envisage the legislative wording to achieve it. I'm wondering if they should re-allow Spinacci bars as a more pragmatic step.You probably would care if you were in that position and a car pulled out in front of you!
Maybe we're not on the same wave length. I was just highlighting the reason i though they were trying to get across about riding in that position ie - not having any control of the bike. Nothing to do with descending speeds, can't recall them mentioning that.I don't think you are getting what I am on about. I can't remember hearing any commentators saying "children, please do not descend Alpine passes at over 100kph..."
Anyway, Valverde made that look easy.
Surely they've still got some control of the bike, like when people ride so-called "Dutch tri bars" by resting their forearms on the flat section near the stem? Still more control than when they ride no-handed, flapping jackets or farting around with the currently-compulsory distracting headgear.Maybe we're not on the same wave length. I was just highlighting the reason i though they were trying to get across about riding in that position ie - not having any control of the bike. Nothing to do with descending speeds, can't recall them mentioning that.
Does crouching on the top tube have a name? I nominate "crapping dog" to go with "puppy paws"Apart from anything else, these new fangled positions, the puppy paws and the pedalling whilst sat on the top tube, just look so awful. Sure I want them banned but it's hard to envisage the legislative wording to achieve it. I'm wondering if they should re-allow Spinacci bars as a more pragmatic step.
The sack separator?Does crouching on the top tube have a name? I nominate "crapping dog" to go with "puppy paws"
The pedalling on the top tube position always reminds me of the PG Tips advert with the cycling chimps. Knees and elbows everywhere.The PG Tips position.Does crouching on the top tube have a name? I nominate "crapping dog" to go with "puppy paws"