thom
____
- Location
- The Borough
I can't agree, he played a perfect team captain role at the worlds, has possibly the best tactical brain of the likely selection, and could do the same - more difficult with only 5 riders - job at the Olympics. It isn't Team Sky that's racing at the Olympics, it's GB. There is only one rider with a real chance on a sprinters course, and that means 4 riders will sacrifice everything to get him to the finish in the right position.
I don't see this course as being a sprinter's course. Sure there are no mountains but I think Box Hill will cause breaks with non-trivial teams represented. Given Cav is likely to win any mass bunch sprint, no team represented in a break will do any work to help bring it back.Team GB alone won't be able to do all that and particularly if there are weaker links. If any team member is below par, it places more pressure on the rest and I don't see how you could disagree with that.
Don't get me wrong, from a GB point of view I'd like Cav to win but I'm just trying to explain my opinion on team GB's chance and in particular people's expectations for Cav.
From the point of view of an interesting race... I might commit treason and say a successful breakaway with real hardmen individual rouleurs slugging out a tactical finish would give a more worthy winner than Cav nipping past on the line.