[QUOTE 1846255, member: 45"]Deary me. I'll ignore this additional display of a complete inability to interrogate statistics and ask you the same question again, as you don't appear to understand the point I'm making.
Me - same journey - walking or cycling - which is safest?
To help you, I'll point out that the reason the scenario includes me in both circumstances is that it removes the differences in the stats that you don't understand (this is the interrogation which you're avoiding or not able to carry out). I don't get drunk, I'm not frail, and I don't get into fights -so that removes some more.
So try again...[/quote]
You keep on making these assertions complete with an absence of any evidence whatsoever. You'll have to do better than "proof by assertion" if you want to be seen as more than just a kneejerk gainsayer. So lets see your figures that show what you claim. Ah, I forgot, you don't do figures or evidence do you? Just assertions.
Me - same journey - walking or cycling - which is safest?
To help you, I'll point out that the reason the scenario includes me in both circumstances is that it removes the differences in the stats that you don't understand (this is the interrogation which you're avoiding or not able to carry out). I don't get drunk, I'm not frail, and I don't get into fights -so that removes some more.
So try again...[/quote]
You keep on making these assertions complete with an absence of any evidence whatsoever. You'll have to do better than "proof by assertion" if you want to be seen as more than just a kneejerk gainsayer. So lets see your figures that show what you claim. Ah, I forgot, you don't do figures or evidence do you? Just assertions.