Oh, I thought it meant you had a legendary member 🍆I dont know. I am a legendary member. Probably because I have been here for years. Or maybe because I have never been banned 😁
I'm suspicious of anyone with a like to post ratio greater than one. I think it indicates a tendency towards simplistic populist rhetoric and a lack of engagement with any sort of serious discussion, insight or wit.Still available assuming messages means posts
View attachment 542051
But unlike on Play your Cards right, points appear to make bugger all.
As you yourself have a score of 1.76 I didn't know whether to like your post or notI'm suspicious of anyone with a like to post ratio greater than one. I think it indicates a tendency towards simplistic populist rhetoric and a lack of engagement with any sort of serious discussion, insight or wit.
Yes and of course you get circle jerk likers. Seem to recall that some of the departed poisonous crowd had very high like counts.I'm suspicious of anyone with a like to post ratio greater than one. I think it indicates a tendency towards simplistic populist rhetoric and a lack of engagement with any sort of serious discussion, insight or wit.
Precisely, a poor reaction score ratio is the only guide to true popularity, that's the hierarchy in my opinion, the worse your ratio the more popular you are.I'm suspicious of anyone with a like to post ratio greater than one. I think it indicates a tendency towards simplistic populist rhetoric and a lack of engagement with any sort of serious discussion, insight or wit.
Oi I'm the only aubergine round here..Oh, I thought it meant you had a legendary member 🍆
Quite so..I'm suspicious of anyone with a like to post ratio greater than one. I think it indicates a tendency towards simplistic populist rhetoric and a lack of engagement with any sort of serious discussion, insight or wit.
Overly simplistic??I think it indicates a tendency towards a lot of people liking someones posts
Help !!As you yourself have a score of 1.76 I didn't know whether to like your post or not
Precisely, a poor reaction score ratio is the only guide to true popularity, that's the hierarchy in my opinion, the worse your ratio the more popular you are.
I tend to agree with people with whom I tend to agree.Yes and of course you get circle jerk likers. Seem to recall that some of the departed poisonous crowd had very high like counts.
As no doubt did don corleone.
It's hard to take this as anything other than a personal attackyou could argue that we still have two or three here that feel a compulsion to post on every single thread, whether they add anything or not.
Woke lefty virtue signalling? Chicks dig it.Of course I inflate this digital clout score by mainly posting in News and Current Affairs, which is Cheating the System and Something Should Be Done.
Woke lefty virtue signalling? Chicks dig it.
2.427. Curse my Relatable Content (Although not as Relatable as @mudsticks whose ratio is 2.61).
Of course I inflate this digital clout score by mainly posting in News and Current Affairs, which is Cheating the System and Something Should Be Done.
It's a shame there's no other metrics, would be nice to see how many times my posts have been reported or how many threads I've participated in have been shut down. Would allow me to set myself targets.
Rather than post counts can we have a mandatory spell checker, including thread titles? I have spent 5 minutes trying to work out why anyone would say hello to somebodies ear ache.