Not with the current technology, you wouldn't!With a drug you still at leat have to use your muscles, your stamina, your brain; even if enhanced to a greater or lesser extent by whatever you have taken. But with mechanical "doping" you could be as fat and unfit, as old and weak as .. well me for instance .. and still compete and beat top class riders.
While there's a strong reason for suspecting her at Koppenbergcross, the only way she could get done for it is if someone whistleblows. It would be interesting to know whether Muylder was around that day. I think, though, that we can only hope that the UCI can make a ban stick.Nikki Harris's (UK cyclocross champion) Fiancee, Mark Brammeier gives us a more involved perspective
http://cyclingtips.com/2016/02/bram...ething-seemed-a-bit-weird-at-koppenbergcross/
Yes.Has this been mentioned yet ?, cycling weekly has an article about electromagnets in deep section wheels.Im geussing it would run on an elctromagnetic field drawing the wheel around so no obvious motor sound and wight penalty .
And I'd guess the technology used to detect Driesshe's motor would also detect that one too.Yes.
It looks a bit like a perpetual motion machine to me, but I'd have to see it in English, with a bit more info. To make a motor work (and that's what it is) you'll end up with weight in the form of either heavy magnets or heavy batteries or both.
No way. If I'm paying E200,000 for a perpetual motion machine, I want a invisible perpetual motion machine.And I'd guess the technology used to detect Driesshe's motor would also detect that one too.
Nikki Harris's (UK cyclocross champion) Fiancee, Mark Brammeier gives us a more involved perspective
http://cyclingtips.com/2016/02/bram...ething-seemed-a-bit-weird-at-koppenbergcross/
My guesstimate was based on "you could be as fat and unfit, as old and weak as .. well me for instance" which I reckoned was a strong hint!Ahemmm.. you have no idea how much raw, unadulterated power I put out - it might be 800W for all you know (Even if in reality, 150W would be a huge exageration !)
I thought Greg Lemond's suggestion of using a thermal imaging camera to look at the bikes was an interesting one (LINK). If a motor is outputting 100 W or so, a lot of heat is going to be produced.
His statements last year annoyed a lot of people (e.g. HERE), but perhaps they would like to reconsider now?
I think the idea was that officials could easily examine all bikes while they were being ridden using cameras at the roadside and/or mounted on official motorbikes. It could make 'mechanical doping' almost impossible to get away with.That would only work whilst the motor is on or for a short time afterwards. I thought have thought a simple tap on the tube, a magnet or looking down the seat post would do it. Even better remove the minimum weight limit and see if anyone wants the weight penalty of a motor and battery.