Pro Tour Punditry
Guru
BTW there is a Pro Race sub-forum on CC, so come in and contribute there 

I'm not saying it was Ok to cheat, but yes I am saying EPO usage was so common then you can't dismiss one persons prowess as solely achieved because he cheated, because the people he raced with and beat and was beaten by also cheated. I know EPO could turn a donkey into a racehorse, we saw that with Lance. 3/4 of the peleton were cheating in that era, possibly more, including all the top guys, so you either take their achievements at face value whilst mentally noting it was the EPO era, or forget there was bike racing. But before EPO there was amphetamines etc and other stimulants which were widely used, so where do you stop? You can't recalibrate everyone's achievement because they had a naturally lower hemocrit level therefore may have benefitted proportionally more from Blood doping.I'm forgetting nothing. You are either over-looking the fact he was a cheat or accepting that as EPO was common then it was ok to cheat - you are also over-looking the fact that the effect on EPO is not the same for everyone, it can turn a donkey into a racehorse.
As I said earlier, if there is a thread started about anyone else who attracts admiration and who was a doper I'll make sure to join in. As it is, the thread is about Pantani.
I don't think anyone needs to work too hard to justify their choice of favourites. Personally I always disliked Pantani, but my own all-time favourite is another deeply flawed genius.
I have a DVD called "Italian Legends of the Tour de France". It's nothing special - I think I picked it up cheap in The Works. It paints an unashamedly positive portrait of four of Italy's greatest post-war cyclists - Bartali, Coppi, Gimondi and Pantani, with particular emphasis on their exploits in the Tour. Phil Liggett presents, at his most reflective, and I think he does a good job. At the end he doesn't attempt to speculate on who is the best. He sums up by saying (words to this effect) that on the one hand we have the romantic tragedians, on the other the hard-nosed pragmatists, and cycling needs both.
They were all at it, go as far back as Coppi and Bartali's era, Fausto Coppi spoke of using La Bomba, even further back use of painkillers were endemic, time moves on and so does the science, perhaps even now someone is developing the next undetectable performance enhancing drug.
There was an interesting programme on tv a while back where a keen cyclist and journalist did an experiment by micro dosing EPO under medical supervision, he trained hard prior to the experiment, got his fitness the best he had ever been, he then started on the EPO, within a few weeks he reported stopping riding with his mates, who were all faster then him because he was leaving them for dust on every climb, the thing is he was tested as pro atheletes are tested, the EPO was undetectable.
Just found this with a quick Google search. I take it this is the one you're on about. Gonna go have a watch of it.