I've always had a wry smile to myself about the difference in response to Voigt and Cunego. I'm very disappointed to see Cunego implicated in this investigation, but I still like him. I like his inconsistencies and his failures as much as his occasional successes. I like his style. Yet Voigt, for all that we know with as much if not more certainly than Cunego, that he has been involved in doping, is presented as the face of real cycling, the fans' favourite. He has even effectively branded himself as such. And I mean, sure, who doesn't love it when he goes on one of these 100km solo attacks? But if that's believable and admirable and Cunego's struggles are less so, then we're fooling ourselves. Cunego is as much or as little of 'the real deal' as Voigt.