As a member organisation of the IPW (my former professional body), I was involved in the consultation process that led to LPAs being created and in the course of career drafted approximately 3000 LPAs. On my retirement insurance now so I can't comment on individual people's circumstances, but here is some background and general pointers if you're interested.
Their predecessor the EPA was open to all sorts of abuses and the test for capacity to do one was based on the Wills Act 1837 which isn't really appropriate - the Mental Capacity Act 2005 accepts that people have capacity at some times and not others. And that EPAs had no safeguarding in them at all. It was thought that nearly
30% of EPAs were used for some sort of financial abuse. Countless dodgy solicitors made a great living from drafting an old lady's EPA then setting up a standing order from their bank account to pay them a hundred quid a week.
They were designed to be easy to fill out, and you can even do them online at the OPG website. It was a classic "designed by committee document" - every month we met up in a conference centre in Birmingham to discuss issues that had come up in its development, and the form got longer. It started out as 7 pages, then went to 14, 21, and at one point 44. It's somewhere in the middle now.
The thing about LPAs is while they are easy for a layperson to draft, the law and some of the issues around them are extremely complicated. The forms themselves have options that can make the LPAs unusable once they are registered. We were very careful to point out that the forms themselves say you should always ask for legal advice before filling one out. And it is one of those things that can't be changed when you need it to be. It was never a nice conversation when someone called me for advice on an LPA when one of the joint attorneys had died, for example.
If I was a layperson writing an LPA for a parent I would much rather pay someone to do it for me. They will ask the right questions to make sure the LPA is going to work when you need it. Avoid a solicitor who will have the meter running, you should go to somewhere that has a fixed price and will do a meeting. An IPW member should not charge more than about £250+registration fee per LPA, and if you shop around it will be cheaper again. But don't go too cheap. Less than £200 is not enough to pay for the time to draft one correctly and give you an unhurried interview where you ask all the right questions. If your parent has issues with memory it might still be possible for them to draft an LPA - but you must see someone with the training to understand the issues.
Besides which, a professional will be able to work out if you're eligible for fee remission, which can potentially pay for a good chunk of their fee.
Not meaning to start an argument
@I like Skol but that's my considered opinion based on my career in the legal trade. And this is the Internet, so I'm going to tell everyone whether any of you asked me or not.
With regards to withdrawing treatment in the case of Health & Welfare LPAs - ultimately in the end it is always a medical decision. However donors can choose whether to allow attorneys to make decisions around life-sustaining treatment or not. And it is important to make the distinction between life-sustaining treatment and euthanasia. LPAs have nothing to do with that at all.
That's the bit everyone thinks about, it's not the important bit. Not at all. Where Health & Welfare LPAs come into their own is when your parent is being looked after. I used to revisit an old lady every year or so (I didn't need to but she was such good fun I did them for free after a few years!). She was really interesting - a Jewish lady who fled Czechoslovakia as a teenager in 1941. Had fantastic stories and she was incredibly stylish. All her clothes, furniture etc were immaculate and expensive. I will never forget the last time to see her after she'd lost her mental capacity (the day I decided I couldn't take a Will instruction from someone I'd known for years was always one of the hardest visits to their family). She had carers in and instead of her deisgner suit, she was wearing an awful easycare polyester dress that she'd have been embarrassed to wear. If her sons had a Health and Welfare LPA, they could have insisted that she was in clothes that she would have liked to wear. Quite a small decision but really important for dignity.
I am sorry to hear about your mum-in-law,
@fossyant .