Indeed, but I think that made people noticeably less dismissive of the risks on that thread, which is why I posted it.Not that I had a problem with it personally, but I suspect you last thread was canned due to draggy-dead-guy content rather than a desire to hush up this very legit problem...
Exactly.Not that I had a problem with it personally, but I suspect you last thread was canned due to draggy-dead-guy content rather than a desire to hush up this very legit problem...
Still, you should have known better.Indeed, but I think that made people noticeably less dismissive of the risks on that thread, which is why I posted it.
View attachment 738943
Just about everywhere is accessible by 12 year olds these days though.
that's not the point and you know it.
Isn't it? Just where is suitable if it's something that needs to be seen, and everywhere is accessible to 12 year olds?
There are much safer and cleaner battery chemistries available, eg sodium-ion.
If they develop sufficiently to be economically viable, and matching or approaching the energy density and cost, then they'll take over.
More importantly, at that point, lithium-ion can and must be banned