simon.r
Person
- Location
- Nottingham
I have an issue with the decision to prosecute (or not) being related to the actual consequences of an incident.
This instance (the OP) could easily have resulted in serious injury and I think the driver should have been prosecuted on that basis, regardless of the actual outcome.
I used to work with a magistrate who told me the tale of how a driver was in front of the bench for mounting a kerb and hitting a lamppost. Because the driver was a nurse, who was tired after a long shift and no injuries were caused the magistrates let her off (I can't remember the specific outcome, but there was no significant punishment). I did point out to him that the lamppost could just as easily have been a pushchair with a young child in it, but I'm not convinced he got the point I was making.
This instance (the OP) could easily have resulted in serious injury and I think the driver should have been prosecuted on that basis, regardless of the actual outcome.
I used to work with a magistrate who told me the tale of how a driver was in front of the bench for mounting a kerb and hitting a lamppost. Because the driver was a nurse, who was tired after a long shift and no injuries were caused the magistrates let her off (I can't remember the specific outcome, but there was no significant punishment). I did point out to him that the lamppost could just as easily have been a pushchair with a young child in it, but I'm not convinced he got the point I was making.