jarlrmai
Veteran
I mean the security of the feet on the pedals.
If only there was a way they could be even more secure.
Seriously though for me it's more the confidence thing than a power thing.
I mean the security of the feet on the pedals.
I say a good set of flats as they're generally more secure than cheap moulded plastic ones that come with the bike.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNedIJBZpgM
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFgHaMHeKyM
1 test shows clipless more efficient, one showing flats as more efficient. Both tests are extremely close suggesting that the difference between them is negligible.
Note that my original claim was NOT that there was NO performance benefit, but that IF there is one, that it is negligible. Several academic articles also show the differences are between the two in terms of pedalling efficiency also show very tiny differences.
If what they were trying to say was true, I'd expect the Pro Peloton would have adopted flats by now. Flats, they are quite clearly the way forward .
Those videos were baloney when they were new, they are baloney that's well past it's sell by date now. If what they were trying to say was true, I'd expect the Pro Peloton would have adopted flats by now. Flats, they are quite clearly the way forward .
For setting cleat position sit on a table and let your feet hang naturally, whatever angle your feet are at is how you want to set the cleats so they the same when clipped in. My feet naturally hang with toe pointed out slightly so I twist the cleat to allow for this.
That works fine unless your natural position would leave your heels banging the chainstays each stroke. bb
The OP made no mention of using clipless because they allowed him/her to transfer more power to the drive train. More likely he/she valued the security they offer.Do you need to use cleats. Unless you're doing a significant amount of stand up sprinting you're not really gaining anything over a good set of flats.
Cleats offer a more secure connection between the shoes and the pedals. Many riders value this benefit: they are, contrary to your claim (above), 'gaining something'. Others prefer the freedom to step away from the pedals without having to twist their lower leg and are prepared to put up with the occasional shin abrasions and slip/lurch/maybe fall when their foot slips off a pedal (normally when force is being applied to said pedal.Cleats are superior . . . . I'd certainly prefer to be clipped to the pedal! But actual power production or efficiency, the difference over flats is negligible.
That works fine unless your natural position would leave your heels banging the chainstays each stroke. bb
So you don't think cleats are worth it, compared to a 'good set of flats', but a good set of flats are "more secure than cheap moulded plastic ones". Surely these are data points on a spectrum of [foot/pedal) security?
The OP made no mention of using clipless because they allowed him/her to transfer more power to the drive train. More likely he/she valued the security they offer.
Cleats offer a more secure connection between the shoes and the pedals. Many riders value this benefit: they are, contrary to your claim (above), 'gaining something'. Others prefer the freedom to step away from the pedals without having to twist their lower leg and are prepared to put up with the occasional shin abrasions and slip/lurch/maybe fall when their foot slips off a pedal (normally when force is being applied to said pedal.
Do you need to use cleats. Unless you're doing a significant amount of stand up sprinting you're not really gaining anything over a good set of flats.
Where's the clarity in Phil's question/original comment (above) that allows you to make such an assumption? I suspect most of us have had a 'crutch and top tube coming together moment' after slipping off a pedal, accelerating away from a traffic lights, for example, and likely shin scrapes to remind us to take care next time.I thought it was clear that he meant gaining as in straight performance terms. Did you not? bb