harlechjoe
Guest
Not sure why you want someone to convince you. Most of us just get on with riding our bikes and make our own choices in the absence of compelling data either way. There are many other everyday activities where a helmet may make much more sense than when cycling. But you don’t see people questioning why people don’t wear helmets when they are at much greater risk of head injury.
View attachment 679228
What we do know is that cycling is extremely safe, about same as walking mile for mile. Both would be even safer if speed limits are reduced, we reduce rat runs, and vehicle use is discouraged where alternates exist. Hence the priority of LTNs in news at the moment.
View attachment 679230
Whilst the points you raise are interesting there are situations when non-cyclists are obliged to wear helmets for safety reasons, construction sites come to mind. Yet my point isn't that helmets or high viz should be compulsory, it is simply that helmets help to reduce the risk of serious head injury and your choice of clothing will make a difference between being seen to be avoided or seen too late and being in a collision.