Guinness do seem to be a bit clueless. Kasja may inadvertently have made a good decision in choosing them, because no sane entrant
in future will choose them over UMCA. But obsessive discussions of rules are what makes it "complex and nuanced".
The thing about these year records is that they are such an esoteric thing, of interest to such a small audience and yet they take such a huge amount of commitment from the athletes. Steve and Kurt aren't internationally famous sportsmen. They aren't even universally famous within the world of cycling. Which is why, in this small circle, each attempt that actually completes 365 days, and even those that don't, will be remembered on its merits. There's plenty of room. This is where I can't agree with the idea that only the record holder is of significance. The small coterie of people who are "in the know" will remember Steve and Kurt's year in 2015, and Steve's heroic, and slightly bonkers, riding with a broken ankle, as well as Kurt's own "teethgrinding" efforts. Amanda's stupendous athletic performance, and her own PTSD problems will be remembered alongside Kasja's more quirky demonstration that ordinary people are capable of doing extraordinary things.
It's as about human theatre as well as just numbers. Which is why, for example, Dorando Pietri is still remembered for not winning the marathon in the 1908 Olympics.
Now, we may all have our favourites. Tastes vary. Me, I like bananas, because they have no bones.
Let's face it, if one of the top pros (male or female) put together a properly funded bid, possibly velodrome based, they would destroy anything that has been or is being done so far. It won't happen because they would lose at least two years of their racing career, for something that is utterly obscure.