Ahem. Are you a horse? As in "A is for 'orses, B for mutton, C for miles," etc. etc.?Panter said:Hay, it was just a thought
Ahem. Are you a horse? As in "A is for 'orses, B for mutton, C for miles," etc. etc.?Panter said:Hay, it was just a thought
Rhythm Thief said:Same here. Incidentally, Arch, an ellipsis is only three dots, with a space at each end, thus ...
661-Pete said:May I suggest that the already-hard-worked moderators will not thank forummers for drawing attention to every single spelling mistake, misplaced apostrophe, split infinitive, or what-have-you?!
Rhythm Thief said:At least two of the more tireless spelling and grammar nazis are mods: they're both on this thread and one of them is me.
...to be pedantic.Rhythm Thief said:At least two of the more tireless spelling and grammar nazis are mods: they're both on this thread and one of them is I.
661-Pete said:Ahem. Are you a horse? As in "A is for 'orses, B for mutton, C for miles," etc. etc.?
Panter said:Is everyone else posting on this thread tripple checking their response before pressing "submit reply"
Arch said:
Pete, I have the same tendency with ellipses. I think it's a way of leaving a point open to discussion sometimes. In fact, it's probably a punctuation version of the Australian Rising Inflexion?
porkypete said:I do too....
But not as often as a former workmate who used rows of dots (of varying length) to the exclusion of all other punctuation.
It was an accurate representation of how he talked, but whilst his verbal communication was crystal clear, as written it could be desperately hard to understand.
Another colleague finally came up with a name for those occasions when the number of dots exceeded the three of the ellipsis:
It was ever after referred to as "the-stream-of-consciousness-mark"
Too right it was! But I needed an excuse to chuck in a bit of cockney alphabet... this thread so needs it!Panter said:It was a deliberate one.
I though that would've been clear given the nature of this thred......,..