he's a great. Sure a lot of his TdF wins were built on HTC lead-outs, but he's shown he doesn't need a team at his beck and call. And he's not just super-fast, he's very clever. His picking of a line and timing are just a wonder to watch.
It's true, bike races over different terrains favour different types of riders. However, the thing that's common to all of them is that the guy who crosses the line first is the winner. He doesn't organise races and pick routes, he just rides them and wins them, which is the point of cycling.So I guess what we're saying is, despite cycling being a multi dimensional sport, it doesn't matter if you only excel in one area, you can still be considered a great rider?
That's a bit like saying Maradonna's not a 'great' cos he was crap in goal.So I guess what we're saying is, despite cycling being a multi dimensional sport, it doesn't matter if you only excel in one area, you can still be considered a great rider?
I think the 2010 Champs Elysee win is the most spectacular:
His HTC lead out is spent having done all the work to bring back the breakaway. Cav was swamped amidst Hushovd's and Petacchi's lead outs amongst others, not well placed.
Then Tony Martin pops up from nowhere and drags Cav to around fifth place going into the final corner. A phenomenal job. But what comes next is exactly as you say, he just leaves them for dead.
The TdF has finished on the Champs Elysee since 1979. Nobody has won it in consecutive years until Cav came along. He has it 4 times in a row now.
That's a bit like saying Maradonna's not a 'great' cos he was crap in goal.
Cav is a great sprinter - that's it.
I read it but may have misinterpreted it! There's certainly an analogy with Maradonna and cycling re cheating and drugs though!Nah you didn't read my post Rich. I was actually clarifying the opposite of what you just said there. Also, I'm not sure if the Maradonna analogy is a good one anyway. He was handy at pretty much every other aspect of the game. He may even have been good in goal, I just don't think I've seen him play there!
I think that he just didn't want to put too much effort in on the climb. He's not in any danger of being eliminated, so he was just saving his energy for the sprint finishes later.Anyone who has the number of TdF wins alone is up there as a 'great'. Having said that I'm surprised how easily he gets dropped sometimes on an innocuous climb considering the M-SR win. There was a quote recently when Voigt said how well Cav was climbing in some race but it's not apparent at the moment.
Maybe he's sandbagging and he'll climb the cauberg like a gazelle next weekend!
I guess what we're saying is that cycling has different specialismsSo I guess what we're saying is, despite cycling being a multi dimensional sport, it doesn't matter if you only excel in one area, you can still be considered a great rider?
I think the 2010 Champs Elysee win is the most spectacular: