tigger
Über Member
This might seem a bit controversial. Don't get me wrong as I love watching Cav win sprints, I like his spikey "tell it straight" personality and lets face it you can't really question his phenomenal stage win haul. Best sprinter of his generation? For sure. Best ever? Possibly.
But I can't help getting increasingly frustrated with his one dimensional ability. He cannot win without huge team effort and generally speaking (with a few exceptions admittedy) he can only figure at the end of flat stages. Indeed, his climbing ability seems to be going from bad to worse despite this being a targetted area of improvement.
So I guess what I'm asking is, regardless of what the history books may show, can we regard Cav as a great cyclist given his lack of all round ability?
But I can't help getting increasingly frustrated with his one dimensional ability. He cannot win without huge team effort and generally speaking (with a few exceptions admittedy) he can only figure at the end of flat stages. Indeed, his climbing ability seems to be going from bad to worse despite this being a targetted area of improvement.
So I guess what I'm asking is, regardless of what the history books may show, can we regard Cav as a great cyclist given his lack of all round ability?