- Location
- London
mm - not maybe the most scientific test monty - I'm all for questioning companies' efforts to sell you up, and if anyone tries to convince me to buy something at a premium for its weight savings I'll maybe laugh in their face, but I rate a lot of the XT stuff.I wouldn't put too much faith in the cost of your rear mech.
When i bought my MTB 20 years ago, it was second hand and needed a new rear mech. I was skint so spent £7.99 on a basic Shimano Acera one. I eventually got it perfectly indexed and a couple of years later, i upgraded the Acera rear mech to an XT one. It made no difference whatsoever... none, nowt, zilch. They even felt about the same weight with one in each hand when i was swapping them over. I've still got the Acera mech which will be going back on should i need to replace the XT one.
That's my personal experience.
So the Acera was on the bike for two years and the XT continues to perform after 18?
I have an old Ultegra rear mech that came on a bike I bought in 2004 and is still running on a second bike, despite once getting a bash that meant I had to have the sacrificial hanger bent back. It's of the tough solid metal type though, not the newer stuff, some of which looks like high-tech tinplate to me. It did get new jockey wheels a couple of years ago, but wouldn't be overly surprised to find that, barring bashes, it outlives me.
I also have a fair few second had XT front mechs - well worth it I think.