@johnr I would not agree with respect to the oath. The information, I assume, is from SCA case and this was a hearing. SCA had the option to go legal but declined and went for arbitration instead. If you also look for longer excerpts on the deposition as it should be referred to you shall find that it was taken over at least 164 minutes and we are afforded no more than 11 minutes and 13 seconds which is 7%. I have not seen any more than this but would welcome if to view any more if it exists. The difficulty in viewing this format is missing 152 minutes or 93% and suggesting we know the content and context of it.
SCA also contested the case on doping whilst they accepted the contract had NO doping qualifications in it. The whole case was erroneous and they were told this by the hearing panel.
If you add to this BA/FA depositions they over heard a DR say certain things you are left with 2 options, either the DR says he did say these things and goes to jail for breaching patient confidentiality or he says no id did not happen. Is the DR willing to go to jail for them?
EO'R needs 3rd part agreement of everything she says and this is unlikely and if 1 person says she is wrong her deposition is either 50/50 or void.
I may be wrong but my understanding is LA has in fact made no oath under Federal or State Law and therefore if he says nothing he cannot perjure himself and nay attempt now he can plead 5th!
I personally have no issue with anything that has gone on as they ALL doped no question however if you do not take time to remove the flowery language and the wonderful descriptions of TH and FL and JV you would think they have not been serial perjurers or done for fraud!
Scrub the emotive language and look at raw data and can I believe 1 side over the other. When you do this you see why FDA dropped their case.
That does not mean it was not right what has been reported, it is, but you also need to understand that proving it legally would not happen.
It also means that for USPS = every other team at the time. Hype is great and we all enjoy it but we also need to scrub it away to see the facts as they are.
It does however make for great debates and discussion and that is why we love it and put up with it!
SCA also contested the case on doping whilst they accepted the contract had NO doping qualifications in it. The whole case was erroneous and they were told this by the hearing panel.
If you add to this BA/FA depositions they over heard a DR say certain things you are left with 2 options, either the DR says he did say these things and goes to jail for breaching patient confidentiality or he says no id did not happen. Is the DR willing to go to jail for them?
EO'R needs 3rd part agreement of everything she says and this is unlikely and if 1 person says she is wrong her deposition is either 50/50 or void.
I may be wrong but my understanding is LA has in fact made no oath under Federal or State Law and therefore if he says nothing he cannot perjure himself and nay attempt now he can plead 5th!
I personally have no issue with anything that has gone on as they ALL doped no question however if you do not take time to remove the flowery language and the wonderful descriptions of TH and FL and JV you would think they have not been serial perjurers or done for fraud!
Scrub the emotive language and look at raw data and can I believe 1 side over the other. When you do this you see why FDA dropped their case.
That does not mean it was not right what has been reported, it is, but you also need to understand that proving it legally would not happen.
It also means that for USPS = every other team at the time. Hype is great and we all enjoy it but we also need to scrub it away to see the facts as they are.
It does however make for great debates and discussion and that is why we love it and put up with it!
