35months and 14 months, they will probably be concurrent rather than consecutive, probably do no more than 18 months.)
The first line from the bbc linky above says "A drink-driver who left a cyclist fatally injured and then reported her car stolen has been jailed for more than four years" so I'd assume consecutive.
However, further down it states: "She was twice over the prescribed alcohol limit at the time of the collision." (as opposed to
proscribed) maybe the maths is no better than the spelling. Or perhaps there are some doctors with particularly questionable ethics in the Oxford area?
Tch tch, the BBC is slipping.
Whatever, it's not long enough in my view particularly given her despicable behaviour after the event. The maximum appears to be 14 years (
http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/fact_sheets/dangerous_driving/), and she gets just under 3?
Difficult to speculate on what one would need to do to get closer to the maximum without getting emotive about it (which is somewhat hard to do in this case) racing whilst drunk perhaps? My imagination isn't up to the task beyond that. It does seem a long way below what she could have got.