Rhythm Thief said:
Why not, O wise one? Not all bikes have to be fast or practical.
They don't HAVE to , no, but it helps. Just like houses don't HAVE to have rooves, but it often helps.
mickle said:
I take it you didn't watch the video Bonjy.
What an absolute gash abomination.
It looks like it's beein painted with dulux primer and he hasn't bothered to do any more than an undercoat, and what's more it looks like he's sprayed it all over rather than the individual parts before assembling them.
The hopeless cable operated steering cannot possibly even dream of being devoid of unwanted noise and modulation must be non existant - in the vid it looked like the wheel was randomly grabbing in the dark for an orientation and the fact that it could steer at all looked a major accomplishment.
Instead of transmitting via a single columnar headset, it uses a long thin arm which can flex, stretch and rattle. How is that possibly going to be conducive to precise, accurate, and therefore safe, steering?
The position of the handlebars means the rider must sit bolt upright, and as such would probably struggle to get any less aerodynamic without carrying a sail.
And I don't even want to THINK about the stresses that parts of the bike must be under - it must be horrendous. It must literally visibly bend just under natural sag.
Just what's the POINT in creations like that?
It makes me angry that a certain minority of people feel the need to dogmatically defy established principles of engineering simply for the sake of being rebellious, if they are then trying to pretend that it's some sort of valid invention or that it's the future. If they're just doing it for a joke, fair enough, ha ha ha very clever, but to try and make out it's in some way good is just ridiculous.