I can only imagine why this never caught on!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
The guy in the store said he'd ridden it with his daughters. Looks like it deserves a Darwin award to me
 

Attachments

  • 20240922_151431(2).jpg
    20240922_151431(2).jpg
    102.9 KB · Views: 81
  • 20240922_151438.jpg
    20240922_151438.jpg
    119.4 KB · Views: 81

alicat

Squire
Location
Staffs
Can't see what 'it' is....
 

HMS_Dave

Grand Old Lady
What happens when one wants to turn left and the other wants to turn right? Strongest wins? Or does the bike split in two?
 

Ian H

Ancient randonneur
It's not a tandem.
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
It's not a tandem.

This bit of pedantry intrigued me. So I did a bit of a search.

Tandem is/was a way of harnessing two horses to a cart/carriage with one horse in front of the other, in contrast to the more normal side by side arrangement. Therefore a tandem bicycle is one with two riders where the riders are in front of one another.

It would seem that this bike is a sociable which is distinct from a tandem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociable

This left me wondering whether, if it just means "in front of one another" does it apply to three or more horses or riders in front of one another? Is that still "tandem"?. Or is it strictly two? (Remember the Goodies) Well, it seems that some horsey people coined the word "randem" for three horses - but it doesn't seem to have caught on.
https://www.carriageassociationofamerica.com/tandem-vs-randem/

However, like so many words, it has a blurry meaning. Common usage has it as meaning "two things/animals/people working together" regardless of their relative positions. Many dictionaries give a definition like that.

Edit: It seems that in the world of track cycle racing, where multi-rider pacing bikes were once common the accepted terminology was tandem, triple, quad and quint for 2,3,4 and 5 rider bikes.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom