It’s a lot harder than a few people have given it credit for over the years. I guess the organisers want to try to reduce the number of deaths from cardiac problems that have plagued the event.it's not like it's a hard ride. WTF.
I couldn't do itIt’s a lot harder than a few people have given it credit for over the years. I guess the organisers want to try to reduce the number of deaths from cardiac problems that have plagued the event.
The biggest problem is that 3 of the cardiac arrests happened within a couple of hundred yards of each other, on the run into, or at the top of Leith Hill. The others were both on Kingston Bridge. So the incidents have been at 2 particular spots, and not spread along the course.This might be a bit off topic:
https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/now-been-seven-deaths-six-14980570
Seven deaths in six years. Five cardiac arrests, two as a result of crashes (one participant and one pedestrian).
Now, there are lots and lots of people taking part. Cycling can be considered part of a healthy lifestyle, so the "big picture" should take these things into account, but all the same it must be a real PR headache for the organisers at the very least.
Personally I don't have the statistical knowledge or background data to give an opinion either way.
There are a few guys in our club late 60s who hang in on the club runs of 60-70 miles no problem. A easy 100 would be no issue to them