Still doesn't hold water. Weight has zero to do with power. If that Mini had a V8 in it, then all bets on your current car would be off, and it would still weigh less.It's not an exact science, but it gives a rough guide of power to weight, making all kinds of assumptions about average fitness and muscle mass and so on. If my bike was half my weight you would conclude that I was very light, or my bike was very heavy - or a bit of both. Either way, it would be impressive if I could shift such a combination as fast as someone with a bike that was 10% of their weight.
It's like cars and trailers - an 400kg trailer would be not much to my current car, but you'd know about it if you tried to shift it with a 1975 Mini 1000
The percentage thing is pointless. If your bike weighs 7kg and you weigh 70kg compared to a bike weighing 12kg and you weighing 120kg, then what does it actually tell you?
If that Mini had a V8 in it, then all bets on your current car would be off, and it would still weigh less.
Well, the reason I raised it was because it points out that the mass of the bike isn't that critical a factor in the all-up mass, which is what you have to drag uphill. If you spend £££ reducing the mass of your bike by (say) 10% you will have reduced the all-up weight by (say) < 1% which is sweet FA. Just in case you're tempted by a carbon bottle cage.
Not very profound I grant you. Statement of the obvious maybe, but not entirely pointless. Just a little reminder that it's cheaper and healthier to lose weight from your waist than from the bike. (Assuming that is, that you are not a stick-thin pro with zero body fat trying to win races)
You could be 18 stone of pure muscle or 18 stone of pure lard. Which one will produce the most power? Again, power has nothing to do with weight.I did say it gives a rough guide. Minis with V8s in them are quite rare, as are people who produce significantly more or less power than the average person.
You could be 18 stone of pure muscle or 18 stone of pure lard..
I bet this forum has quite a few that would appear on your "irrelevant" list.Which would make you an outlier on the normal distribution - i.e. unusual, i.e. irrelevant in a *rough* guide.
ye Gods man. My breakfast weighs not than you do!As I'm around 60 Kg my best bike is relatively heavy at 7.6kg - Therefore I obviously NEED a much lighter one . BTW I saved 52gms by getting a couple of carbon cages ! Actually I suppose I could still loose a few Kg body weight .......