Steep enough to give you nose bleeds.let me guess the boston hills aren't very steep?
Cheers Ed
Steep enough to give you nose bleeds.let me guess the boston hills aren't very steep?
Cheers Ed
Very long hills (18+ minutes): improve threshold, reduce weight
Long hills (10+ minute): improve threshold + power at VO2 max, reduce weight
Short hills (3-8 minute): improve power at VO2 max, reduce weight
Very short hills (<1.5 mins): improve anaerobic power, upper body and core strength, reduce weight
And he certainly would not with his professional peer climbers which is the context it is meant to be. Be real man!Lol I was going to post this too. I am sure that "useless" as he is Cav would still show a clean pair of heels to almost any club rider in hill climbing.
Sounds good, you are both very welcome to come over to Rutland [just brilliant cycling country] and ride with us anytime, you are about 40 mins away.Don't be fooled peeps, Slimzoe is better than she makes out. OH here, at work as usual.
Yes an improvement in the hills would be an advantage but all other aspects of her riding are spot on and coming along nicely.
She can quite happily cruse at 18+ on the flat without over stretching herself.
Technique with gear selection and controlling cadence are one of the areas we are working on.
Oh and the biggest hurdle is self confidence Zoe does not believe she is as good as she is. Do you Hunni?
So far we have two good rides planned this year. nightrider 100k in June and 100 miler from Nuneaton to Skeggness. We are also considering the Shakespeare ride in Aug either 100k or 100 miles, but the 100 miler looks like a very hilly second half.
sorry tactics change from post to post here!Sorry ED I seem to have you mixed up with someone else who averages 12mph for a ride. Clearly that can't be you as that person wouldn't be blasting up any sort of incline at 15-18 mph never mind real steep ones at 6-8 mph - length no problem to use your words.
Sometimes, I like "talking rubbish" as it triggers expert like you to react on something which is trivial to the rest of us who have no ambition to be good climbers, but just mere cyclists who enjoy a good ride without worrying about hills. No offence to the OP .Given that no-one on cyclechat is likely to be anywhere near to their physiological limits as a pro rider like Mark Cavendish is, your whole "Well Cav is crap in the mountains" justification for your cobblers is a load of old balls.
However humouring you for a moment:
1) He is a lot better in the hills as it stands than he would be had he followed your proposed philosophy and avoided them and any sort of suffering like the plague
2) His climbing ability has not been maximised. He would be able to improve his ability in the mountains beyond his current ability if he chose to focus on this and lost some weight. However, given that he excels as a sprinter and will never be the best climber, he quite rightly focusses his efforts on this, a discipline which tends to run contrary to sprinting, if he was to concentrate on improving his climbing his sprint would most likely suffer!
In short, even those not particularly suited to hill climbing can improve their ability to climb considerably and.you are talking rubbish!
Sometimes, I like "talking rubbish"
I love this reply lol succinct and to the point!Hill climbing - mind over matter.
That's about it.
Oh and man up.
oh and stamina has never been an issue anywhere in life that is the one part i win on
Cheers Ed
And he certainly would not with his professional peer climbers which is the context it is meant to be. Be real man!
Sometimes, I like "talking rubbish" as it triggers expert like you to react on something which is trivial to the rest of us who have no ambition to be good climbers, but just mere cyclists who enjoy a good ride without worrying about hills. No offence to the OP .