I am really getting frustrated with the responses the police have towards incidents like this. First they say there needs to be a collision for them to investigate, then they say that as there wasnt any damage or injury, they dont care. I f*cking hate the police.
So do the police think this is acceptable?:
http://s1132.photobucket.com/albums/m562/monkeysnutscom/Videos/?action=view¤t=CX57ZDL-
2Veryclosepasses.mp4
The term 'collision' is probably confusing you. In policing terms it's only a 'collision' if someone was hurt, or a vehicle (bikes included) damaged.
If its not a 'collision' the driver doesn't have to provide you details, and there's little we can do. Feeling annoyed because she was laughing at you would get the same response as someone overweight complaining that some feral youth ran past and called them 'fat'. Morally it's absolutely wrong, but there's very little the police can do under the restrictions of the law. A lot of people tend to turn to us thinking we are miracle workers, that we can hear your side, prove it 100% with no element of doubt, dish out instant restorative justice of some sort, and leave you happy.
If you had been injured, the police officer would have taken the report. If you bike had been damaged the police officer would have taken the report. Neither of those things happened, which means we are effectively powerless - which he seemed to tell you at the scene.
I also not your 'I ****ing hate the police' comment, and compare it to one you gave some time ago, when the driver got out of his car and confronted you, and you stated you were very happy with the 'nice policewoman' who came over, watched the footage, discussed the matter with you and promised to go speak with him. We have to act with common sense, and we can only hope that most people understand this (which they do). However, the one thing proved time and time again is that you can never keep everyone happy, all of the time.