Drago
Legendary Member
- Location
- Suburban Poshshire
The most stringent, authoritative and independent physical lid testing is funded by the Road Safety Trust and carried out by Folsam. They periodically pull together a fair range of lids and test them, and very few end up on their recommended list.
There are plenty of MIPS (or equivalent type system) lids that don't make their recommented list, and some conventional lids that do.
The presence of MIPS has the potential to make a helmet 'safer', but as can be seen it does not automatically do so.
It is over simplistic at best, and incorrect at worst, to suggest that a MIPS equipped helmet is automatically more effective at reducing injury than a conventional one, when this independent testing has shown that to be demosntrably not the case.
There are plenty of MIPS (or equivalent type system) lids that don't make their recommented list, and some conventional lids that do.
The presence of MIPS has the potential to make a helmet 'safer', but as can be seen it does not automatically do so.
It is over simplistic at best, and incorrect at worst, to suggest that a MIPS equipped helmet is automatically more effective at reducing injury than a conventional one, when this independent testing has shown that to be demosntrably not the case.