"There have been no credible attempts to impose mandatory helmet use in the UK in my cycling life",
They were. You are right. My use of words was lazy. I was speaking of Westminster. I have that awful English affliction of not taking regional assemblies in the least bit seriously. I ought to have written 'across the UK' but I did not. I confess to having no more interest in the babblings of quasi-MPs in regional talking shops than I do in Bracknell Borough Council. I'm lazy and dismissive like that.
When a contributor started to take things to a regional level (to demonstrate how scarily close we'd been to Helmegeddon), the debate had moved on from my earlier comment and I made my contempt for the impact of regional assemblies on the wider UK pretty clear.
I still think there have been no credible attempts in my cycling life. What I was ignoring was anything that may or may not have been said in regional or provincial assemblies. In the same way that I ignore children's television now that I'm old enough to vote.
But it's OK. I wrote lazily about a zillion posts ago. I'm sorry. It won't kill me.
You found me out. I'm heartbroken, but it won't kill me.
I'll be able to keep cycling legally helmetless in the UK for decades to come. Amusingly, that might kill me.
But I'm not sure that's a helpful comment at this time.
Keep up the mighty fight to prevent us from suffering from the highly unlikely. You seem to be winning.