Helmet replacement

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

MikeD111

Well-Known Member
Location
West Sussex
Dropped my helmet and it has a small bend in it. I've also had it four years so thought I would treat myself and potentially save my life at the same time!

Looking at road use only. Would like to budget around £80.......

Like the look of the Kask Majito but can I get more for my money?

Thanks
 
Depends on what you mean by "more"

This helmet does not have Snell certification and also has sharp "snag points" that some experst believe may cause injury or for teh helmet to be ejected in an accident

YOu can certainly get a smoother, rounder Snell certified helmet cheaper
 

vickster

Legendary Member
For snell certification, I think it's mostly specialized that have that, although they seem to be coy about saying so for specific helmets

This might do if you have a smaller head

https://www.cyclestore.co.uk/specialized_s3_helmet_2014-ID_60994?gclid=CLb3vYjK38cCFUZAGwod_hkDCA

Buy on comfort and fit, then looks. Go to local bike shops, try some on. I must have tried about 20 different ones before settling on the uvex boss race. Cost and hassle returning them, so try and buy in store
 
D

Deleted member 23692

Guest
Just looked a the Snell certification for bike helmets and apart from Specialised the only other (few) bike helmets certified are from unknown chinese brands. IIf Snell is that great, where are the likes of Giro, Bell, Poc, Kask Catlike and the other main players in the helmets market?

just saying'
 
SImples

It is not in their interests to do so

Most helmet testing (EN1078, CPSC ANSI etc) is done on batches provided by the manufacturer for that purpose and is not always the same as the ones that the public wears. A few years ago one helmetthat had passed the required test in the production process failed every single test when a retail model was tested.(Trek Anthem C recall). Snell tests helmets taken from retail outlets so you know that the helmet IS the same as you wear

Secondly it costs money.

A manufacturer will pay for testing of a helmet that is mandatory (EN1078 in the UK / EU) as no matter the inferiority or low stringency of the test - you can get away with it

Paying "unnecessarily" for the highest and post stringent tests which your helmet may then fail is not a popular move.

However it is your choice.

AlI that I would suggest is that if your helmet is only certified as EN1078 - ignore it. Seek a helmet that has CPSC, ANSI or Snell certified

EN1078 is not accepted by some organisations as adequate
 
Nothing wrong with pointy bits. Bell Sweep R or the Volt should fit into that price range now.

Each to their own, but the very pro helmet Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute would disagree

This was evidence given to the US Body that regulates helmet testing by the wonderfully named Professor Hurt of the US Head Protection Research Laboratory - an organisation that develops everything form cycle helmets to military ones

The adverse effect of this aerodynamic shape is that the wedge at the back of the helmet tends to deflect and rotate the helmet on the head when impact occurs there. Any impact at the front or sides of the streamlined helmet is no different from other helmet shapes, but any impact on the rear wedge tends to rotate the helmet on the head, probably deflecting the helmet to expose the bare head to impact, and at worst ejecting the helmet completely from the head. Actually, everybody who has tested these streamlined helmets over the past years has encountered the problem of these helmets being displaced during impact testing at the rear wedge. Usually additional tape was required to maintain the helmet in place during rear impact tests; usually the basic retention system alone could not keep the helmet in place during impact testing on the rear of the helmet.

Unfortunately, the implication of helmet displacement and possible ejection in an actual accident impact did not register as a real hazard in previous years of testing, but now there are accident cases appearing that show this to be a genuine hazard for bicycle riders wearing these streamlined helmets. Accident impacts at the rear of these streamlined helmets can cause the helmet to rotate away and expose the head to injury, or eject the helmet completely. The forces generated from the wedge effect can stretch the chinstraps very easily, and even break the [occipital--Prof. Hurt used a trademarked name] retention devices.

We request that F08.53 committee study this problem and develop advisory information for both manufacturers of these streamlined helmets and consumer bicyclists who now own and wear such helmets. There is a definite hazard for displacement or ejection from impact on the rear wedge of these helmets, and bicyclists should be warned of this danger by an authority such as ASTM.
 
Dropped my helmet and it has a small bend in it. I've also had it four years so thought I would treat myself and potentially save my life at the same time!

Looking at road use only. Would like to budget around £80.......

Like the look of the Kask Majito but can I get more for my money?

Thanks

http://www.wiggle.co.uk/giro-savant-road-helmet-with-mips/

This is a corking lid, it's got the MIPS protection system as well, and a chunk of cash off at the moment.
 
There are some concerns about MIPS technology

It is an inner helmet "shell" that in an impact can move about 5 mm inside the helmet. This is supposed to reduce concussion and other injuries

However most helmets will naturally slip this type of distance in a crash, so the benefit is dubious at least
 

ayceejay

Guru
Location
Rural Quebec
I agree with the suck it and see approach. If you feel the need to wear a helmet for your safety rather than because the
event regulations say you have to your criterion is different, and you should check for comfort: meaning how hot does it get
(check vents) how heavy it is, how easy it is to clean after the spongy bits stink of sweat, adjustment and so on.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
One one of my courses a student was holding their helmet on their lap, when it rolled off, fell less than 2 feet to the floor, and split over half its circumference. Dreadful think what it would be been like with some weight inside it, say a head perhaps?

It was a SNELL certified Specilized lid if anyone fancies avoiding brand.
 
One one of my courses a student was holding their helmet on their lap, when it rolled off, fell less than 2 feet to the floor, and split over half its circumference. Dreadful think what it would be been like with some weight inside it, say a head perhaps?

It was a SNELL certified Specilized lid if anyone fancies avoiding brand.
They are designed to fail, that's how they dissipate the energy. I'd have been more concerned if it hadn't failed.
 
That's not how they are designed to dissipate energy.
Depends on the lid, some (CF etc) are designed to form new surfaces ( dissipates energy through the heat created) some are designed to disintegrate, again by disintegrating the energy of the impact is lost to heat, then the heat is lost to the disintegration. I'm guessing you're a helmet refusenik, never mind eh?
 
Top Bottom