Have you been Wordle-ing (no spoilers please)

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

T4tomo

Legendary Member
1648127906042.png


NYT shot across Wordle2's bows:laugh:

WordHurdle 130 4/6 #wordhurdle #peace

πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ’›πŸ’™πŸ€
πŸ’›πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ’™πŸ’›
πŸ’™πŸ€πŸ’™πŸ€πŸ’™πŸ’›
πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™

https://www.wordhurdle.in

 
Last edited:

Beebo

Firm and Fruity
Location
Hexleybeef
Another 4. I think I’m starting to get a bit bored with it now for some reason.


Wordle 278 5/6

⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨
🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I have stopped, as of today. I am on 50 unbeaten so time to call it a day.
A tricky 5 is often more rewarding than an easy 3.
I’m sure NY times have seen a drop off in users.
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
WordHurdle 130 6/6 #wordhurdle #peace

πŸ€πŸ€πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ€πŸ’›
πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ’›πŸ’™πŸ’›
πŸ€πŸ€πŸ’›πŸ€πŸ’™πŸ€
πŸ’›πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ’™πŸ€
πŸ’›πŸ’™πŸ€πŸ€πŸ’™πŸ€
πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™

https://www.wordhurdle.in
#Worldle #62 1/6 (100%)
πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŽ‰
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
Wordle 278 4/6

⬜⬜⬜🟩🟨
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
 

PaulSB

Squire
Looks like NYT have had a word with Wordle2

WordHurdle 130 3/6 #wordhurdle #peace

πŸ–€πŸ–€πŸ’›πŸ–€πŸ’›πŸ’™
πŸ–€πŸ–€πŸ–€πŸ–€πŸ–€πŸ–€
πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™

https://www.wordhurdle.in
 

PaulSB

Squire
The bigger question is have the NYT spaffed $1million up the wall?
I think this is quite likely. It's a nice puzzle, a brilliant idea but I know I'm only doing it to keep my run going. It's easily solved in 2-3 minutes and 3-4 lines with the right starter words.

One morning when I was especially bored I worked out my starter word gives me at least 35 potential positives and my follow up gives 44. My maths is nowhere near good enough to calculate how many combinations that gives. A result in 3-4 lines is very likely except for the odd occasion we get thrown a curve ball.
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
I think this is quite likely. It's a nice puzzle, a brilliant idea but I know I'm only doing it to keep my run going. It's easily solved in 2-3 minutes and 3-4 lines with the right starter words.

One morning when I was especially bored I worked out my starter word gives me at least 35 potential positives and my follow up gives 44. My maths is nowhere near good enough to calculate how many combinations that gives. A result in 3-4 lines is very likely except for the odd occasion we get thrown a curve ball.
Using the approach I take it generally comes out in 4 about half of the time, the rest being roughly evenly split between threes and fives. Twos and sixes do happen but rather infrequently.

But the fact that it's quite easy and doesn't take all that long is part of its appeal for me. I'm not into hard-thinking games. I'm too stupid to get any satisfaction out of them.
 
Top Bottom