lay
Guest
Whichever one you're getting all twisty-knickered about.
I'm not getting all 'twisty-knickered' about anything.
Certain people cannot comprehend that a helmet saves your life FACT
Crazy-assed forum this...
Whichever one you're getting all twisty-knickered about.
Before my time, Wise Old Elf...That the 11+ exam was a valid model for life.
I'm not getting all 'twisty-knickered' about anything.
Certain people cannot comprehend that a helmet saves your life FACT
Crazy-assed forum this...
The FACT that almost everyone drives and some cycle does NOT mean that hardly anyone walks, FACT.Is this ANOTHER fact you cant understand, that (nearly) EVERYONE DRIVES and some cycle...
ANYWAY everyone DRIVES a car nowadays, hardly anyone walks, so....
At last, something we agree on. Though possibly not on what those moderators should do upon viewing the last ten pages of this thread...It's been a long time since I've frequented this forum, yet it's basically a total waste of time, upon this experience. More moderators necessary to police this place.
As it's a failure.
I'm not getting all 'twisty-knickered' about anything.
Certain people cannot comprehend that a helmet saves your life FACT
Crazy-assed forum this...
Yo
Helmets save lives FACT - what bit of that will you lot NOT ACCEPT !
I may have this wrong, but it would appear that lay believes there are no pedestrians.What you have repeatedly been asked is why you think that in a pedestrian the same helmet would NOT save their life.
You have stated that saving a life in this way is "pathetic"
Now that is crazy
I may have this wrong, but it would appear that lay believes there are no pedestrians.
Without walking? What sort of crazy talk is this?
Roller skates and a wheel barrow perhaps?Perhaps in that case someone carries the peron who is carrying him?
Would it though? And this is genuine question - if helmets were indeed saving people from serious head injury, how would these people become part of the stats? It seems to me that a major problem for both the sides of the argument is that the vast majority of reported incidents are only reported because they are serious enough to warrant it. There must be a severity threshold beyond which helmets, as sold currently, have no decernable effect. The question then becomes where is that threshold and does it's position justify me wearing, or not wearing, a helmet. I think it does, but I'm happy for that to be my decision and I wouldn't mention it if we were out for a ride together and you didn't have one on.
I agree that no-one can say with absolute certainty that a helmet saved their life without replicating the incident without helmet - which will obviously render them unable to gloat.
You, like many in this world will never understand things that are beyond you as per your opinion...
To level yourself in statistics is missing the point - MISSING THE POINT !
Helmets save lives FACT - what bit of that will you lot NOT ACCEPT !
I will keep on till i get bored... LMAO