rogerzilla
Legendary Member
No-one under 45 will get that@rogerzilla , agree that you’d be daft to head off downhill on a pair of Smokes, you should have a Dart on the front
No-one under 45 will get that@rogerzilla , agree that you’d be daft to head off downhill on a pair of Smokes, you should have a Dart on the front
NopeI'll ask this is all seriousness. Why not?
Would either of the above, some type of registration document or paying a road tax be beneficial to us cyclists?
YesBefore any knee jerk responses, prepare a list of Pros and Cons. Study it carefully. What did you manage to find that could be put under the heading Cons?
I have a license which covers me for car, HGV, Bud/Coach, Motorcycle (Advanced) I think the only thing I'm not qualified for is a tracked vehicle, what advantage would a cycle proficncy test do me?Rider training may go some way to reducing accidents. At the risk of courting vitriol, would anyone undertake if they'd been educated on the risks.
What would the fully comp cover?Since we're on public roads/tracks and often on private property, the 3rd party (I'd go further and opt for fully comprehensive) cover would be a good idea.
Has that worked for car, motorcycles?Registration documents would undoubtedly reduce theft.
What purpose do you envisage they would be for, if identification how large do you expect them to be?Number plates (which are compulsory in some countries already) would allow for easy identification.
Paying 'road tax' would completely remove that hoary old chestnut.
I just don't get why people can't keep a damn bike clean
And waste all that time that could be spent riding it?
Would either of the above, some type of registration document or paying a road tax be beneficial to us cyclists?
Rider training may go some way to reducing accidents. At the risk of courting vitriol, would anyone undertake if they'd been educated on the risks.
Since we're on public roads/tracks and often on private property, the 3rd party (I'd go further and opt for fully comprehensive) cover would be a good idea.
Registration documents would undoubtedly reduce theft.
Number plates (which are compulsory in some countries already) would allow for easy identification
Paying 'road tax' would completely remove that hoary old chestnut.
Neither actually. The bike is a **** danger. Forgot to mention the completely rusted spokes, couple of which are so thin it's probably just rust, no metal at all. If the listing clearly states "unroadworthy" or some such, then fine. Caveat etc.
Please feel free to move the post into what you consider the most relevant section.
Personally I'd like to see some sort of MOT system for bicycles!
Or the number marked as a fake call & set to reject, hopefully not used in the future in the case of a real emergencyI imagine a call about a rusty bike gave the police something to chuckle about .
Personally I'd like to see some sort of MOT system for bicycles!
Would have thought a feisty fettler such as yourself would be no stranger to wheel building? Sounds like an interesting project. Will the dropout orientation be an issue?, the OLD of the steel frame less so.
And proficiency tests for riders? Mandatory third party insurance?
If you need it, I can link you to a good wheel building vid, and a spoke length online calculator - let me know.I've never built a wheel from scratch. I've trued plenty, some from a pretty bad state and involving brute force in the first stages. I don't ever recall seeing a factory-built ISO 559 rim with a SA 3-speed in it, so it's going to have to be DIY. Fortunately, a hub gear wheel doesn't need any dishing, which simplifies the job considerably by the look of it. The most challenging part looks to be calculating the correct spoke length required.
Dropouts are horizontal on those lugged 501 Raleigh frames and I'm not worried about the spacing as the stays are hi-tensile and can be "persuaded" that they want to be a different dimension.
If you need it, I can link you to a good wheel building vid, and a spoke length online calculator - let me know.
If you're in the UK.I'll ask this in all seriousness. Why not?
Would either of the above, some type of registration document or paying a road tax be beneficial to us cyclists?
Before any knee jerk responses, prepare a list of Pros and Cons. Study it carefully. What did you manage to find that could be put under the heading Cons?
Rider training may go some way to reducing accidents. At the risk of courting vitriol, would anyone undertake if they'd been educated on the risks.
Since we're on public roads/tracks and often on private property, the 3rd party (I'd go further and opt for fully comprehensive) cover would be a good idea.
Registration documents would undoubtedly reduce theft.
Number plates (which are compulsory in some countries already) would allow for easy identification.
Paying 'road tax' would completely remove that hoary old chestnut.