D
Deleted member 26715
Guest
Which bit was illegal?What caused the front rider to stop? - the illegally driven Landrover.
Which bit was illegal?What caused the front rider to stop? - the illegally driven Landrover.
At least 95% of cyclists are bad and dangerous here. Drive down here and see for yourself.95%?
Sigh… Why am I bothering?
I would say it was very inconsiderate, bordering on the dangerous, however all the issues were self inflicted by the cyclists.None of it..
Load of bull
Silly man. Should of prosecuted the cyclists for offensive language etc.
Hence he was prosecuted for Careless Driving. Seems reasonable, no?I would say it was very inconsiderate, bordering on the dangerous, however all the issues were self inflicted by the cyclists.
Not sure you're best suited to be a tourism ambassador.Drive down here and see for yourself.
Careless DrivingWhich bit was illegal?
If you think Northamptonshire is in the southwest, you may be the BBC's geography correspondent...: “…we are going over live now, to our south-west transport correspondent…
We will never know as a judge was not able to decideCareless Driving
A judge can throw an unjust case out, can't they?We will never know as a judge was not able to decide
the event was the driving, not the fall.Is there no thought about prosecuting the first rider who actually caused the event which caused the rider to fall? If you take the LandRover out of the equation, the actual 'accident' was caused by
a) the front rider stopping
b) the second rider riding too close
c) having a clipped in moment
So although the pass by the LandRover was not nice & more consideration could have taken place