Guilty or Not Guilty

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Roseland triker

Cheese ..... It's all about the cheese
Location
By the sea
95%?

Sigh… Why am I bothering?
At least 95% of cyclists are bad and dangerous here. Drive down here and see for yourself.
 

Randomnerd

Bimbleur
Location
North Yorkshire
<<BBC Radio Four Studio, Salford, a moment ago>>

….technicians tapping away at complex keyboards…somewhere in the midday sky, satellites scud across the northern hemisphere…in the same continent, surgeons sew up the bomb-torn limbs of orphans…



Sarah Montague switches on her mike after a quick sip of water and a moment in which to clear her throat. Gordon, assistant producer, runs the live feed and her desk module light glows green: “…we are going over live now, to our south-west transport correspondent…Hello, Trevor. Welcome to The World At One. Now, give us your considered opinion about the moment Harry, Jane and Stella were cycling along a road and met a Land Rover, and how the whole thing turned up on a quiet cycling forum. Give us your expert opinion…”

“Aaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggghhhhhhhhhh”

“Thanks Trevor. Immigration….”
 

Poacher

Gravitationally challenged member
Location
Nottingham
I wonder how that Landy driver would have reacted if he encountered, say, a recumbent trike. :cuppa:
 

MontyVeda

a short-tempered ill-controlled small-minded troll
Is there no thought about prosecuting the first rider who actually caused the event which caused the rider to fall? If you take the LandRover out of the equation, the actual 'accident' was caused by

a) the front rider stopping
b) the second rider riding too close
c) having a clipped in moment

So although the pass by the LandRover was not nice & more consideration could have taken place
the event was the driving, not the fall.
The driver was prosecuted for their driving, not for causing an accident.
 
Top Bottom