Despite it explicitly saying twice stuff like "you might have a view but until we get to read the reasoned decision everyone is left offering their cent’s, penny’s, centime’s and centavo‘s view which is noise", you took the opposite?
My view is that he is being punished for the result of the movement, rather than the movement itself. As there a ‘reasoned decision’ being provided to show why they decided to pick a 9 month ban helps to assure my view.
The severity of the injuries were not entirely the fault of Groenewegen, and that should not be forgotten whilst trying to apportion blame. Groenewegen should only be assessed for his movement, not the result of the movement combined with the factors which were out of his control (but within the control of the organisers, and regulatory body) such as a downhill finish and barriers which were evidently not secure should there be a crash which leads to contact with them.
I take your point that until the decision has been published we are all responding to press articles and editorial and we should await the UCI’s decision, but I can still believe that so far all blame seems to be laying at the door of Groenewegen which I believe to be wrong.