Giro d'Italia 2013, 4th-26th May - [Spoilers]

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

woohoo

Veteran
Most web sites are showing the bunch as getting the same time, so it looks like no change overall (so far!).
 
OP
OP
thom

thom

____
Location
The Borough
I heard Wiggins has lost more time and has dropped back to 90th?? Is just pre stewards adjustment?
General Classification after Stage 5
ITA 1 PAOLINI, Luca (KATUSHA) 19:56:39
COL 2 URAN URAN, Rigoberto (SKY PROCYCLING) + 17
ESP 3 INTXAUSTI ELORRIAGA, Benat (MOVISTAR TEAM) + 26
ITA 4 NIBALI, Vincenzo (ASTANA PRO TEAM) + 31
CAN 5 HESJEDAL, Ryder (GARMIN SHARP) + 34
GBR 6 WIGGINS, Bradley (SKY PROCYCLING)
ITA 7 CARUSO, Giampaolo (KATUSHA) + 36
COL 8 HENAO MONTOYA, Sergio Luis (SKY PROCYCLING) + 37
ITA 9 SANTAMBROGIO, Mauro (VINI FANTINI - SELLE ITALIA) + 39
AUS 10 EVANS, Cadel (BMC RACING) + 42
 

montage

God Almighty
Location
Bethlehem
Interesting that Bradley has reverted from oval chainrings to standard ones "in order to deal with the steeper climbs" - thought the opposite was supposed to be true
 
OP
OP
thom

thom

____
Location
The Borough
Interesting that Bradley has reverted from oval chainrings to standard ones "in order to deal with the steeper climbs" - thought the opposite was supposed to be true
Based on that quote, I would guess it's due to stability with gear changes. When you change to the inner ring on an uphill without momentum due to a steep pitch, I'm imagining your chain will be taut and perhaps the irregular shaped target inner ring is a harder target to hit. That might have caused the bike parking incident, i dunno...
More speculation : osymmetric rings give a minor efficiency gain when you are really on top of the gear, so steep climbing is not the scenario.
 

smutchin

Cat 6 Racer
Location
The Red Enclave
Interesting that Bradley has reverted from oval chainrings to standard ones "in order to deal with the steeper climbs" - thought the opposite was supposed to be true

The commentators were suggesting the reason for the standard chainrings was compatibility issues with Shimano 11spd electronics. Are they wrong? Is the steeper climbs quote direct from Brad?
 

montage

God Almighty
Location
Bethlehem
The commentators were suggesting the reason for the standard chainrings was compatibility issues with Shimano 11spd electronics. Are they wrong? Is the steeper climbs quote direct from Brad?

From Team Sky's webchat - the 11spd electronics sounds like a more plausible explanation though
 

triangles

Über Member
The commentators were suggesting the reason for the standard chainrings was compatibility issues with Shimano 11spd electronics. Are they wrong? Is the steeper climbs quote direct from Brad?
I'm fairly sure I've read this earlier this year
 

woohoo

Veteran
IIRC, the smallest Osymetric rings are 36 or 38 but a compact will be 34, so it might be a gearing issue and 11 speed (chain rather that electronic, per se) might be a compatibility issue.

Happy to be corrected.

(... and as for gearing in the Giro, it was only a few years ago that some of the teams were fitting triples for the really steep stages.)
 

Rob3rt

Man or Moose!
Location
Manchester
If they (Sky) wanted him on Osymetrics or if he wanted them, then they would have him on them. Regardless of "compatability", they would get round it. People have modified them (including making them thinner) to suit various setups. Not sure of the UCI reg's on modifying things though? BTW, the new Shimano 11spd uses a different spider arrangement, only 4 bolts, yet he was riding on a 5 bolt SRM power meter so he may still be on a 10spd chainset so there would be no issue anyway.

Most people who use Osymetrics report improved recovery and less fatigue, rather than improved speeds and power output and many of those reporting increased power output may well be misunderstanding the data, as some power meters will provide inflated readings when using non-round rings even if there is no actual increase in rider power output. The use to minimise fatigue makes sense from a GC rider stand point.

Lots are speculating that it is the case that Shimano simply did not want him on those rings and said he should be using their products. Others speculate that the fad is over. Who knows, or indeed cares all that much, it's just a "silly ring" as Wiggo puts it!
 
Top Bottom