In that docu, didn't his wife say that off the bike Brad was a lovely bloke, but on the bike he was a twat? Or words to that effect.As I've said somewhere else on here previously, much as I like Wiggins' refreshing attitude and forthright, plain-talking views, his behaviour does veer toward petulant and childish sometimes.
In that docu, didn't his wife say that off the bike Brad was a lovely bloke, but on the bike he was a twat? Or words to that effect.
That wouldn't be a surprise, many top sportsmen used to be like that. It seems nowadays that many sportsmen are right twats away from the sport as well.In that docu, didn't his wife say that off the bike Brad was a lovely bloke, but on the bike he was a twat? Or words to that effect.
Wiggins has said he will support Froome but i am not 100% convinced he will even ride. From Sky's point of view, Wiggins' inclusion is a must. He provides a 2nd option should something happen to Froome regarding form, illness or accident. Sky don't strike me as the sort to put all eggs in one basket. Maybe in the past but they tend to learn from past mistakes quickly.Surely it's not certain that Brad will ride the Tour?
Slight outside bets could be Rodriguez, Hesjedal and maybe the likes of Gesink. Still can't see past the top two of Wiggins and Nibali.
Definitely a possibility with the current form and also with his exceptional team mate Dan Martin.I've not been impressed with Hesjedal's early season form but looking at him in the LBL right now, he seems to be hitting his peak at exactly the right time.
Surely most people are different at work than in their personal lives. I certainly am.That wouldn't be a surprise, many top sportsmen used to be like that. It seems nowadays that many sportsmen are right twats away from the sport as well.
Wiggins has said he will support Froome but i am not 100% convinced he will even ride. From Sky's point of view, Wiggins' inclusion is a must. He provides a 2nd option should something happen to Froome regarding form, illness or accident. Sky don't strike me as the sort to put all eggs in one basket. Maybe in the past but they tend to learn from past mistakes quickly.
In no way does splitting Froome and Wiggins up make Sky stronger - unless they have personal issues which cannot be resolved.
If Wiggins rides then i would think he will not be happy playing wing man, especially if he doesn't succeed in the Giro.
He missed Paris Nice and i believe he is missing the Dauphine criterium also. Both of which he won in 2012. I don't think he is into repeating and if he is not going to compete for the jersey then he may not ride the race at all. Just my opinion.I'm not a big cycling historian but how many times has the current champion not ridden the following year? I can imagine sky wanting froome and wiggins riding just in case one of them can't complete but surely as current champ Wiggins will be there in whatever capacity.
Anyone know how easy it is to "jam" the signal frequency on electric gears? This could be a whole new area of cheating, with teams trying to jam revival teams frequency?
Current electronic gear systems are wired, aren't they?
More times than you would think. During my lifetime, off the top of my head, Tour de France only....I'm not a big cycling historian but how many times has the current champion not ridden the following year?