He retired suffering from a severe vowel deficit.On a slightly different, and tenuously Giro related theme, what happened to Stefan Kr[unspellable]wyk
You could make a good argument from that that Dumoulin lost the Giro on the Finestre descent. I’m not sure he could have dropped off the mountain at the same rate as Froome, but hanging around for Pinot and the rest of group was probably the wrong decision. Hopefully lesson learned and it might lead to a few more Hail Mary chase-downs in coming GTs.A lot of you will have seen this on Twitter but this is where Froome took the time, not including stage bonuses. From what I can see, none of his ascent times threatened any of the best times on the main climbs.
View attachment 411267
Why now in this thread though ? It seems all of a sudden...
On a slightly different, and tenuously Giro related theme, what happened to Stefan Kr[unspellable]wyk
But do you think it would be about "doping" if it was Yates who won ? Would it have been the same questions asked ? Like I said I enjoyed the race,it was brutal and in the end it was won by Froome like it or not.We all knew Froome was in it right or wrong and my point is none of this negativity started until he showed his colours so to speak.Why are we discussing Yates and Froome? In a thread about a race which Yates led for a long while and which Froome is leading? And both of whom have failed drugs tests.
I suppose it was his choice to race, and there is a degree of inevitability that discussions will focus on doping where the winner of the race has proved positive for a banned substance in amounts well in excess of permitted levels, and in circumstances where his defence appears to be "I was a bit out of breath"But do you think it would be about "doping" if it was Yates who won ? Would it have been the same questions asked ? Like I said I enjoyed the race,it was brutal and in the end it was won by Froome like it or not.We all knew Froome was in it right or wrong and my point is none of this negativity started until he showed his colours so to speak.
there is a degree of inevitability that discussions will focus on doping
How about you take your crap to the appropriate thread?
Why now in this thread though ?
Which thread would that be?
Fair enough, I am glad I'm a regular pro race contributor as well as a smart arseFair enough, but there are sone who never visit the pro racing section of the forum except to make snarky comments about doping, and it’s always the same tired old crap we’ve heard a million times before. I wouldn’t mind if they actually wanted to engage in the discussion but they don’t, they just want to be smart arses.
Lol I take being a smart arse as a compliment !Fair enough, I am glad I'm a regular pro race contributor as well as a smart arse
Thief !It doesn't look like they've managed to finish that stadium in time for the race...