Right - @frankiexxxxxxx appears to still not have managed to use the 'reply' button, so we don't know who the random posts are aimed at.
She made a number of points in her initial post, some of which have been addressed by other users here.
None of her replies have addressed these points.
She is still in moderation, and replies with no substance or that do not quote the point she is responding to will not appear here.
So, frankiexxxxxxxxxxxxxx - either reply to the the substance of the posts, or go away.
Just wanted to demonstrate it really was a troll rather than someone willing to discuss....Give her a break , must be hard posting and driving on an empty head !
Not showing up as a shared IP, no.It's just a (very bored) existing member isn't it?
not on twitter
Not showing up as a shared IP, no.
Wow, I bet the Police have set up an incident room for this one. It happened move on with your life.
Not sure she's got the hang of what the 'like' button means - she's reported a couple of posts for RUDENESS* that she has 'liked' !
Oh come on, there was a numbered list of suggestions. A numbered list!I'd say 7/10, and that's being generous. Yes, road tax is mentioned. Yes, there's a frankly implausible story involving a randomly violent cyclist, but there are significant lapses, for instance there is no "I am a cyclist but", there is ZERO confusion between flout and flaunt and there is no mention of colour blind ginger children. It's not bad, but these are major weaknesses. I'm granting a point for the license/licence confusion, before you mention it.
Do you ever cycle on the road @frankiexxxxxxx ?