General consideration

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
U

User6179

Guest
Right - @frankiexxxxxxx appears to still not have managed to use the 'reply' button, so we don't know who the random posts are aimed at.

She made a number of points in her initial post, some of which have been addressed by other users here.

None of her replies have addressed these points.

She is still in moderation, and replies with no substance or that do not quote the point she is responding to will not appear here.

So, frankiexxxxxxxxxxxxxx - either reply to the the substance of the posts, or go away.

Give her a break , must be hard posting and driving on an empty head !
 
U

User6179

Guest
Wow, I bet the Police have set up an incident room for this one. It happened move on with your life.

I will look forward to the Crimewatch reconstruction :thumbsup:
 
I'd say 7/10, and that's being generous. Yes, road tax is mentioned. Yes, there's a frankly implausible story involving a randomly violent cyclist, but there are significant lapses, for instance there is no "I am a cyclist but", there is ZERO confusion between flout and flaunt and there is no mention of colour blind ginger children. It's not bad, but these are major weaknesses. I'm granting a point for the license/licence confusion, before you mention it.
 

winjim

Smash the cistern
I'd say 7/10, and that's being generous. Yes, road tax is mentioned. Yes, there's a frankly implausible story involving a randomly violent cyclist, but there are significant lapses, for instance there is no "I am a cyclist but", there is ZERO confusion between flout and flaunt and there is no mention of colour blind ginger children. It's not bad, but these are major weaknesses. I'm granting a point for the license/licence confusion, before you mention it.
Oh come on, there was a numbered list of suggestions. A numbered list!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom