paulw1969
Ridley rider
- Location
- Long Eaton, Notts.
Need some advice here folks.
A couple of weeks ago i posted regarding a Garmin 200 stating that it would be sufficient for my needs.......now (as usual) i am beginning to wonder whether i should go for the 500 as it would allow me to monitor heart rate and my cadence.
So does anyone out their want to share their views on the advantages of using both the cadence and HR functions in relation to monitoring their progress and or training to get bike fit and losing weight in real terms of use. I am unfit (although i have been on the X trainer the last few weeks whilst waiting for my bike) and overweight. Is it worth going the extra money for these functions or do you quickly reach a plateau whereby you dont tend to use these functions anyway?
I'm sort of thinking along the lines of using the extra functions as an improvement aid/target to reach type of tool so i would appreciate any feedback from people who have used these functions to do the same.
hope the above makes sense.
Paul
A couple of weeks ago i posted regarding a Garmin 200 stating that it would be sufficient for my needs.......now (as usual) i am beginning to wonder whether i should go for the 500 as it would allow me to monitor heart rate and my cadence.
So does anyone out their want to share their views on the advantages of using both the cadence and HR functions in relation to monitoring their progress and or training to get bike fit and losing weight in real terms of use. I am unfit (although i have been on the X trainer the last few weeks whilst waiting for my bike) and overweight. Is it worth going the extra money for these functions or do you quickly reach a plateau whereby you dont tend to use these functions anyway?
I'm sort of thinking along the lines of using the extra functions as an improvement aid/target to reach type of tool so i would appreciate any feedback from people who have used these functions to do the same.
hope the above makes sense.
Paul