That got me curious, so I took my thigh and upper arm measurements: 23" and 13", respectively. Well, I guess my centre of gravity is lower than it used to be. My main problem these days is finding work trousers that fit the thighs without being too loose at the waist.
Not that I'm seriously comparing myself to Froome, I'm just a guy perilously close to middle-age, trying to do as much cycling as possible, to stave off inevitable mortality.
What is fascinating is that top motor bikers have similar physiques.
Again for a power weight ratio gain.
thats james (something or other i cant rem ,no youre quite right ,most mbike racers arent that big ,but their look is totally different to a top cyclist ,more normal id say and most are strong as they need to be for heaving a heavy bike about ,in fact some look as if they spend a lot of time in the gym ,id even say moto gp demands on the body muscles are more demanding /physical than f1(cos apart from a strong neck and good reflexes its just sitting down eh ?whereas on a mb theres a lot of shifting weight and muscling the bike ,of course being cardio fit comes into the equation but thats a diff story![]()
Not many road riders look that heavy up top.
Pre or post Frank? Because the latter is terribleWell I'm more of an all rounder like Andy Schleck.
Pre or post Frank? Because the latter is terrible
iirc David Millar claims in his book that for mountain stages upper body strength is essential, the arms giving up when honking for extended periods long before the legs and lungs do.
You still end up using the arms a lot on major climbs. On my first (and so far, only) climb up Mt Baw Baw east of Melbourne (a hors categorie climb), my arms were aching when I got to the top, and I stayed seated for most of the climb.Most top climbers seem to stay seated most of the time