U
User169
Guest
Will he hold off the burgeoning Columbian talent of the likes of Quintana and Uran Uran ?
...
Time for them to dust off their yellow jerseys (well T-shirts)...
Will he hold off the burgeoning Columbian talent of the likes of Quintana and Uran Uran ?
...
It would be interesting to read David Walsh's book.
If my memory doesn't fail me I remember Wiggins was eager to defend his title and what we heard that Sky were more inclined to go with Froome leading the team. I vaguely recollect an interview with Wiggins where the question of Froome leading the tour was put to him and his reply was something like "we are professionals and we all want to lead the tour but he was confident he would be the one to lead the Sky team at the tour." So my question is, was a genuine injury what kept Wiggins out of the Tour? Or was just Wiggins throwing the toys out of the pram?
Agreed but people are kidding themselves if they think Froome would have had 2012 with the same ease! The past is the past, we should just leave it there and leave the what if's the f*ck alone.Wiggins would have got destroyed at this years Tour, sky knew who would bring the tour home and it wasn`t Wiggins
"When he won the stages of the Ax 3 Domaines and Mont Ventoux he was performing at a level that was similar to those athletes that are known to have doped in the past.
"That means there's been even more questioning around those performances, because people are looking at this person and saying, 'Well if he's not doping then how is he at that same level?'
"The answer to that is complex, because it's not simply that if you go too fast you must be doping. There are many other factors that affect the performance on a given day and so it needs a little bit of caution and a little bit of insight to understand fully what the data is saying."
Agreed but people are kidding themselves if they think Froome would have had 2012 with the same ease! The past is the past, we should just leave it there and leave the what if's the f*ck alone.
Ps, that elevation on your Velo profile is nuts.
Agreed.Agreed but people are kidding themselves if they think Froome would have had 2012 with the same ease! The past is the past, we should just leave it there and leave the what if's the f*ck alone.
Ps, that elevation on your Velo profile is nuts.
It sounds like they have buried the hatchet thankfully, although time will tell.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/froome-spat-with-wiggins-over
Anyone else struggling to maintain interest in this? I feel like I should give a toss, but I don't...
Nobody will ever get a good answer to that question. To me this is just re-hashing old news and is rather tedious and unimportant.
There is a new season just round the corner. Brad is unlikely to go for GC, so what will be interesting is to see what targets he sets and where he applies himself. Let's look forward to that.
Let's also look forward to what Froome does as a GC rider. Will he hold off the burgeoning Columbian talent of the likes of Quintana and Uran Uran ?
I'm much more excited about the stories of the future of GB cycling racing : the Yates brothers, will Geraint Thomas or Ian Stannard do something in the classics. Oh yes, Mark Cavendish too...